[THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
- From: "Jeff Durbin" <techlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:33:25 -0800
This behavior will result if you don't allow the CAG client as an exception
to the Windows firewall. If you configure your firewall to allow exceptions,
then make the connection with the client, it should ask you if you want to
allow the CAG client as an exception. Answer yes.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:42 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
Did you enable/disable the Split DNS setting and see if that changes the
behavior??
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:03 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
FQDN, outside points to 68.X.X.X address.
Internal it is an internal address, of course.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:53 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
From internal, I ping www.bemis.com <http://www.bemis.com/> , I get
192.x.x.x address, while within CSA connection from internet, I ping
www.bemis.com <http://www.bemis.com/> and I get 68.XXX address??
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:43 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
Are you about trying to ping the CAG, or, internal addresses from the
outside?
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:39 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
Yes.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:34 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 4.1
Did you click the option to allow ping and on the admin page?
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:17 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Access Gateway 4.1
Had a demo unit put in.
Can make the Secure Access connection fine, open to all IP/port.
Can resolve names internal, but can't successfully ping.
Any ideas?
I thought this thing was supposed to be easy to configure.
:-)
Other related posts:
