[THIN] Re: AAC and WI on the same box?
- From: "Steve Greenberg" <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:54:00 -0700
Sounds really good, I would suggest Netscaler as the ideal load balancer, it
can be used to CAG, to AAC and to WI. Also, test the user capacity on the
CAG devices. The real world reality of concurrent users turns out to be
significantly less than the marketing materials!!
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of J. Henske
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 12:21 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: AAC and WI on the same box?
I'll have at least 2 boxes at each site. They will be locally load balanced
with a VIP and I'm hoping I can put a global load balancer in to load
balance the VIPs.
I will have around 25,000 users pulling the config.xml and 1000 peak CAG/AAC
users.
Jennifer
On 11/6/06, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is no problem to combine them, it saves hardware but does create a single
point of failure. However, if you have multiple servers doing this, you are
covered there..
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net <http://www.thinclient.net/>
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Other related posts:
