I found the following; Title 50 Code of Federal Regulations § 27.51 (Wildlife & Fisheries) Disturbing, injuring, and damaging plants and animals. (a) Disturbing, injuring, spearing, poisoning, destroying, collecting or attempting to disturb, injure, spear, poison, destroy or collect any plant or animal on any national wildlife refuge is prohibited except by special permit unless otherwise permitted under this subchapter C. (b) [Reserved] Title 36 Code of Federal Regulations § 2.2 (Parks, Forests, Public Property) Wildlife protection. (a) The following are prohibited: (2) The feeding, touching, teasing, frightening or intentional disturbing of wildlife nesting, breeding or other activities. What is disturbing? I don't think you have to argue a disturbance must have a negative effect. Merely modifying the behavior of an animal, such that it flies toward you rather than continue whatever it was doing, is a disturbance of the animals normal routine or behavior. Personally I have nothing against using playback to call birds in low-traffic areas. Ronnie Kramer Austin On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Tripp Davenport <tripp.davenport@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > I just noticed on several descriptions regarding the flame colored tanager > at boot springs, posted on ebird...that people reported the bird " > responding vigorously" to taped recordings of the flame colored tanager > song...Is use of electronic calling permitted in the national parks system? > I am considering going for the bird but would not consider using a call to > confuse it or other birders in the canyon... > > Tripp Davenport Uvalde Texas > > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at > //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds > > Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission > from the List Owner > > > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner