[texbirds] Re: unwelcome news from Laguna Atascosa
- From: Marie Stewart <littlebitrv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mudonthetires2012@xxxxxxxxx, TEXBIRDS <texbirds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:50:18 -0500
I also have to agree with the closing. Do I like the fact that it is
done, No but I am a very sure in time that a solution will be reached.
In todays world people have a tendency think that it is all about right
now not tomorrow. It is about now what if another female is killed and
this could happen what will this do to this population? We all have to
sit back and wait for the right solution what ever it is!
Thanks for your time,
Marie Stewart
On 10/1/2013 7:21 AM, Dippin Dipwit wrote:
> I'm sure if we were to stop and think, there are many other areas that have
> been deemed "off limits," in order to provide sanctuary to other animals.
> I agree, public access should be secondary. Especially if the mission is
> suffering.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Paul D. and Georgean Z. Kyle" <DWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: September 30, 2013 at 10:41:33 PM CDT
>> To: <robertjbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "texbirds" <texbirds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [texbirds] Re: unwelcome news from Laguna Atascosa
>> Reply-To: DWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> A National Wildlife
>> Refuge should be just that: a wildlife refuge. Public access should be a
>> secondary consideration at best.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Paul Kyle
>>
>>
> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
>
> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission
> from the List Owner
>
>
Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
//www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission
from the List Owner
Other related posts:
