[texbirds] Re: unwelcome news from Laguna Atascosa
- From: Dippin Dipwit <mudonthetires2012@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Texbirds <texbirds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:21:21 -0500
I'm sure if we were to stop and think, there are many other areas that have
been deemed "off limits," in order to provide sanctuary to other animals.
I agree, public access should be secondary. Especially if the mission is
suffering.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Paul D. and Georgean Z. Kyle" <DWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: September 30, 2013 at 10:41:33 PM CDT
> To: <robertjbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "texbirds" <texbirds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [texbirds] Re: unwelcome news from Laguna Atascosa
> Reply-To: DWA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> A National Wildlife
> Refuge should be just that: a wildlife refuge. Public access should be a
> secondary consideration at best.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Paul Kyle
>
>
Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
//www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission
from the List Owner
Other related posts:
