Jim, that's because you omitted the most important part of the Flamingo message....the smiley face! ;-) Clay Taylor Calallen (Corpus Christi) TX Clay.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent from my iPad > On Mar 20, 2014, at 4:53 PM, "Jim Sinclair" <jim.sinclair@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Good grief, folks. Some of you need to recharge your sense of humor. Mary > and I both thought my error was hilarious. > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jim Sinclair <jim.sinclair@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Well, I know that I will never, ever forgive Mary Gustafson for >> questioning my report of 10 Greater Flamingos on the Norias division. My >> report should have stood on it merits. >> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Steve Gast <segast23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I find it enjoyable to find and submit something that gets flagged. I >>> don't look for these on purpose but do get a kick out of finding something >>> out of the ordinary. I have made mistakes in data entry and a few times I >>> don't have a good enough description for it to be accepted ( yeah - OK - >>> sometimes too I just blow the ID) But that is ok because I end up learning >>> how to study a bird better or how to ID a bird correctly the next time. I >>> am sorry for putting reviewers to extra work though. I really don't want to >>> do this on purpose and so I never complain about either having to submit >>> more details or volunteering to pull the record down due to insufficient >>> observation. I have the lesser amount of work to that of the busy eBird >>> reviewers ( God bless 'em) >>> >>> The process however it plays out should be a learning one and enjoyable. >>> >>> Steve Gast >>> Houston TX >>> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Brady Surber <supersurber@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It would be much easier to document flagged sightings if one knew ahead >>> of time what would get flagged, to my knowledge there is no way to view a >>> list of what the filters hit. Frequently I get flagged for species that >>> shouldn't be rare(granted that can only be fixed by more sightings with >>> documentation) or that are in unusual numbers. Cases such as this if it >>> were possible to know or see a list by region of the filters /with expected >>> numbers it would be astoundingly easier for all of us to document things >>> better. >>>> regards, >>>> Brady Surber >>>> Vernon, TX >>>> >>>>> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:52:18 -0700 >>>>> Subject: [texbirds] eBird's position on documentation >>>>> From: heraldpetrel@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> To: texbirds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> Texbirders >>>>> I thought I would chime in here and provide some insight into how eBird >>>>> views the process of documenting rarities, and why that is important. >>>>> Photos are not required to support a record, but they are an excellent >>>>> source of documentation. That said, before digital photography was >>> widely >>>>> accessible to the public, birders adequately documented birds through >>>>> careful description. In some cases, a careful description can be better >>>>> than a photo. Photos in the absence of any text description are >>>>> problematic. Ideally, a record would have both. eBird editors should >>> not be >>>>> invalidating records with text descriptions as a rule. On the contrary, >>>>> they should be evaluating these to the best of their ability. If that >>> is >>>>> not happening, I need to know about it. That said, some people refuse >>> to >>>>> provide details, and it can be tiresome for volunteer editors who spend >>>>> countless hours trying to keep the database clean for scientific >>> purposes >>>>> to request details and get none. The eBird review team in Texas has a >>> huge >>>>> volume of records to review every day, and this is generally a >>> thankless >>>>> job. Without them, eBird would cease to function, so please do your >>> best to >>>>> help them by documenting any flagged records you submit to the best of >>> your >>>>> ability. >>>>> >>>>> Please see the links below to learn more about the eBird data quality >>>>> process, and how to adequately document your records. >>>>> >>>>> Data Quality: http://help.ebird.org/customer/portal/articles/1055676 >>>>> >>>>> Documentation: >>> http://help.ebird.org/customer/portal/articles/973980-reporting-rarities--elements-of-a-bird-description?b_id28 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Brian >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> =========== >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Brian L. SullivaneBird Project Leader * >>>>> www.ebird.org >>>>> >>>>> *Photo Editor* >>>>> Birds of North America Online >>>>> http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/BNA >>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at >>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds >>>>> >>>>> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking >>> permission >>>>> from the List Owner >>>> >>>> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at >>>> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds >>>> >>>> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking >>> permission >>>> from the List Owner >>> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at >>> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds >>> >>> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking >>> permission >>> from the List Owner >> >> >> -- >> Jim Sinclair (TX-ESA) >> TOS Life Member >> Kingsville, TX >> >> "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of >> thinking we were at when we created them." - Albert Einstein > > > > -- > Jim Sinclair (TX-ESA) > TOS Life Member > Kingsville, TX > > "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of > thinking we were at when we created them." - Albert Einstein > > > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at > //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds > > Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission > from the List Owner > > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner