My point on the Greater Frigatebird is a bird out of season deserves a second look. It likely is something more common, but when something is odd, it deserves a wider net be cast for other possibilities. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:43 PM, <MBB22222@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not quite sure with what you completely disagree. Asking about MAFR > photo I wrote in just little sarcastic way but asking for photos of important > sightings was serious (if I said I saw GRFR I would expect from myself and > others to provide some very good diagnostic photos) > > Mark B Bartosik > Houston, Texas > _http://www.pbase.com/mbb/from_the_field_ > (http://www.pbase.com/mbb/from_the_field) > > > In a message dated 3/26/2013 7:31:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > brushfreeman@xxxxxxxxx writes: > > . On the other hand all important records should have photo documentation > included if ID of the birds can be questionable. If MAFR vs. GRFR is a > problem - do not accept any MAFR without the photo (as I do not have > one). I > rather think about birds that are here but can easily be misidentified" > > Completely disagree with this...I hate having to take photos to prove a > point...Especially of normally occurring birds. > > > Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at > //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds > > Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission > from the List Owner > > -- David Sarkozi Houston, TX (713) 412-4409 twitter ID dsarkozi Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner