[texbirds] Re: Texas County Big Years?
- From: Kenny Anderson <kennya290@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Clay Taylor <Clay.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 11:47:10 -0600
The Austin area is flooded with California transplants. My advice to folks
down at the coast is to let them think they have it made in the sunshine
state.
Travis County could only produce 310-320 on the very best conditions/best
year.
Kenny
Gloomy and birdless Austin
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Clay Taylor
<Clay.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> David et al -
>
> I was stunned when I Googled the area of San Diego County - 4,526 sq
> miles (11,722 km²)!!! That is more than Nueces (1166), Kleburg (1090) and
> Kenedy (1946) combined (4202), and only slightly less than those 3 + San
> Patricio County (+ 707 = 4909) or Aransas County (+ 528 makes 4730 total).
> Wow!
>
> I think that the area / habitat mix of San Diego County, CA is just a bit
> too much for any of our single TX counties - at least of those I am
> familiar with. That county is HUGE, and covers a LOT of different
> habitats AND altitudes - ocean, salt marshes, urban landscape, riparian,
> grasslands, agricultural, foothills, mountain coniferous, desert, etc.
>
> Now, if we combine the four TX counties above, we still do not have the
> habitat diversity (no snow-covered mountains that I have ever found here),
> but we might be able to give SD a run. Can you tally up a combined Bird
> List for those 4?
>
>
> Clay Taylor
> TOS Life Member
> Calallen (Corpus Christi), TX
> Clay.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: texbirds-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:texbirds-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of David Sarkozi
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 9:33 AM
> To: TexBirds
> Subject: [texbirds] Texas County Big Years?
>
> I was just reading on the ABA FB page there was a San Diego County, CA big
> year record of 387. It got me wondering, would a total that high be
> possible in a Texas County? Texas Counties, especially coastal ones,
> average smaller than California Counties, that may be just too big of a
> handicap. I looked at some numbers from 2013 in eBird and looking at some
> random counties I though would be candidates I found the following (County
> species reported/high count for one observer?
>
> Cameron 357/295
> Nueces 345/307
> Harris 337/280
> Hildalgo 332/303
> Aransas 330/241
> Galveston 331/280
> Travis 328/300
> Bexar 327/282
> Brazoria 324/279
> Calhoun 320/255
> Matagorda 309/248
> Jefferson 308/300
>
> Clearly the key is coverage and coastal, although the big urban counties
> also do well. the best county was 30 off the CA record. Is there enough
> meat on the bone in these Texas counties to top the CA record some day?
>
> --
> David Sarkozi
> Houston, TX
> (713) 412-4409 twitter ID dsarkozi
> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
>
> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking
> permission from the List Owner
>
>
> Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
> //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
>
> Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission
> from the List Owner
>
>
>
Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at
//www.freelists.org/list/texbirds
Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission
from the List Owner
Other related posts:
