I concur with Richard, Dan, Brush, and Jim (reverse chronological order of posting) in regard specifically to Mark's right not to disclose the location of this bird. We all need, in confronting such a conundrum, thoughtfully to consider what plausibly could happen, in the case of disclosure, to the "target" bird, to other birds or wildlife that may need to use the same locale, to the habitat itself, to the interests of property owners (if the bird is in such a locale or if widespread disclosure could reasonably be deemed to threaten those interests), and to other persons who may legitimately have rights to the area who have other interests, if disclosure arguably would affront those interests. In sum, due consideration should be given to biological, environmental, and social responsibility, and a decision yes/no be made about disclosure. Even if one is incredibly excited about one's find and wishes to "shout it from the mountaintops," some soul-searching should, I suggest, precede (and sometimes should obviate) that. One may even wish to consult on that decision, confidentially, with experienced birders who are known to have a sense of responsibility in regard to what they do relative to birding. In the end, the decision will be one's own, but it may be hoped that birding ethics and social responsibility will be given their due weight in such a decision. I know that such a decision often can be an agonizing matter, for I once had to confront such a decision myself. I strongly desire to share, but there can be other considerations. We live in a time of huge numbers of birders who can learn quickly of such sightings and head out, cameras on the ready. Sheer numbers can have devastating consequences, even if all are well behaved. We therefore must recognize that norms of the past sometimes may be unsuitable today. The above certainly is not to suggest that rare birds should not be publicly reported to birding forum(s), simply that the consequences of one's decision about so doing should be deeply, thoroughly and honestly pondered before making a decision and acting on it. In many cases, such reporting may be deemed appropriate and desirable, including as payback if one regularly uses the tip-offs of others to guide one's birding. There, though, are times when it may be inappropriate. What one often would do is not necessarily the thing one should do in specific instance(s). Finally, notifying a public forum that one has found a prized rarity but with site not disclosed obviously can occasion resentment among some birders. I doubt that anyone would disagree with that. Rex Stanford McAllen TX Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner