Abundance Codes Most of us are familiar with Abundance Codes on checklists. The ABA publishes Abundance Codes for all species found in the ABA area, for example. Many site checklists also include abundance codes. Regardless of the application, virtually all checklists that include Abundance Codes assume that the code applies only to proper habitat and proper season for that species. Interpreting actual 'abundance' can be ambiguous, however. It can be based upon actual numbers of a given species that are present, or it can be based upon the chances of actually seeing that species. Although those two criteria are related, they are not synonymous. For example, Common Paraque (COPA) are, indeed, common in the LRGV in proper habitat and season. But, should a birder expect to see it on most trips to the Valley? no, it is not to be expected on most trips. (Unless of course, they go to Estero Llano, where the staff usually has one or more staked out!). Conversely, the Tropical Parula (TRPA) is considered rare, yet is seen on most tours to the Norias Division of the King Ranch - again because a few individuals are "staked out". I'm working pro bono on an ecotourism program for a major organization that has multiple sites. Part of the project involves creating checklists, and I want to standardize the format across all sites. Currently, I plan to use codes to represent the chance of seeing a particular species (in season and in habitat) rather than the actual abundance. Under the criteria above the COPA would be listed as expected on fewer than half the trips, while TRPA would be listed as being seen on most trips. Offline feedback appreciated. -- Jim Sinclair (TX-ESA) TOS Life Member Kingsville, TX "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." - Albert Einstein Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner