Considering that Office 10 for MacOS X (considered one of the slickest implementatins of that suite on any platform) is a "Unix implementation" of it, isn't it disingenous of this Microsoft "Spokesman" to claim that the "engineering cost" for a Linux version wouldn't be justified! Sheesh. More power to Staroffice, I say! === LINUX PROMOTER VIEWED AS 'SKUNK IN THE ROOM' BY FEARFUL PC MAKERS The chief technology officer of Red Hat, a company that sells a version of the Linux operating system, told a federal court hearing the Microsoft antitrust case that executives of manufacturers such as Compaq, IBM, and Dell were so fearful of retaliation from Microsoft that they treated him as though "a skunk had come into the room" when he approached them about putting Linux software on their PCs. "As the representative of the only competitor in the domain in which Microsoft remains all powerful, I have often felt, more than the Maytag repairman, that I have the loneliest job in town." Although Microsoft licenses a version of its Office software that runs on the Apple operating systems, a Microsoft spokesman said that his company sees "no great demand" for Office on Linux, and that the engineering cost of making a Linux version of Office would not provide a sufficient return on investment to justify the expense. (Washington Post 25 Mar 2002) http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11835-2002Mar24.html