Pedants, the lot of you! Geez people, I'm not trying to _REALLY_ justify it, I just think it's something sort of 'The Matrix'-like (I mean, using humans as _batteries_ to power computers...using humans as _food_ to power computers...see the similarity? hmm??) Of course it's not bloody likely, I'm talking about fiction dammit, suspend that disbelief mister! * Steve Baker (ice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) on [07-20-00 10:12] did utter: > Neil Doane <caine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > * Steve Baker (ice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) on [07-19-00 19:15] did utter: > > > Humans and tanks will be cheaper and more effective for quite some time > > > I > > > should think. Besides, nuclear power is a much more efficient and > > > reliable > > > long term energy source if you want to build a roaming people eating > > > machine. > > > > Okay, well obviously ice has no sense of fiction. I mean, think 'The > > Matrix' or 'Terminator' or something. :) Besides, can you show me a > > portable nuclear generator that we have working right now? Self-sustaining, > > Virtually every deep space probe we've ever launched was equipped with a > nuclear pile, and several moon missions carried along nuclear piles to power > the many scientific instruments that were left behind. How they worked and > much power they produced is unknown to me but they must have been designed > to produce at least 8 watts for at least some 20-30 years, which they did, > and all were small enough for a single man to lug around. Ah, so there were, I stand corrected. =) Neil ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . /._ o / --personal="caine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" /|//- / / --business="caine@xxxxxxxxxxx" / ''- / /__ --homepage="http://antediluvian.org/"; ' ~~ http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~