[tech-spec] Re: R arguments
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: tech-spec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 06:34:37 -0500
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 03:13:58AM -0400, Daniel Flam wrote:
> Have you tried PROLOG?
:-)
Forth wasn't pretty either.
Dirk
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "BBands" <BBands@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tech-spec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:55 PM
> Subject: [tech-spec] Re: R arguments
>
>
> > > You could post this suggestion on R-help, but only if you were able to
> > > purchase http://snipurl.com/9r3h before Professor Ripley read your
> > > post
> >
> > I do find it interesting that one should need flame protection for the
> help
> > list for what is arguably the most user-hostile piece of software ever
> > written.
> >
> > --jab
> >
> >
>
>
--
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
-- Groucho Marx
Other related posts:
