[TAML] Re: god logic
- From: waterdog <SWITHENBANK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: teamamiga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
from: z*
> <
> >> > I am god. ;)
> >
> >> I heard Eric Clapton was god. lol. But now that I'm learning guitar
> >> I'll be god soon.
> >
> > No...Stevie Wonder is god. And, I can prove it!
> >
> > God is love.
> > Love is blind.
> > Stevie Wonder is blind.
> > Therefore:
> > Stevie Wonder is god.
> um ..
> the way that is stated , the logic is false , i think ..
> ok well , it is incomplete at least ..
> ARGUMENT FROM BLINDNESS (II)
> (1) God is love.
> (2) Love is blind.
> (3) Stevie Wonder is blind.
> (4) Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.
> (5) Therefore, God exists.
No. Complete at step (4). The assertion to show was Stevie Wonder
is God, not that God exists...;^)
> http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/GodProof.htm
> http://wiki.answers.com/Q/If_God_is_love_and_love_is_blind_and_Stevie_Wonder_is_blind_is_Stevie_Wonder_God
> ""
> Your proof is a syllogism. Insert a quarter and try again.
Yes...your point?...;^)
> ""
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism
> gah , i dont want to think that hard , so im just going to say ..
> ! is not , neener neener ! ;P
> ;)
> l8r
> z
--Alan
<swithenbank@xxxxxxx>
Other related posts:
