I'm in for the lanyard weather it be a club card or NAR/ Tripoli card. Also, I like the idea of a pad manager at the bigger launches. It can be a bit over whelming for a solo RSO to keep track of everything they are expected to. I'll even flip the bill for a decent set of two way radios, as I think that would help at the bigger launches. My 2 cents Mike Sent from my iPhone On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Sam Fineberg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The other option would be Tripoli/NAR cards (or both in my case). Then all > we need is a plastic sleeve and lanyard for everyone. > > Sam > > On 2/9/2012 2:37 PM, James Dougherty wrote: >> :-) >> >> That's funny. Well, we can get all the club members cards, but it will >> cost probably $5-10 per person to make them. What do people think >> about club cards? Would people be willing to pay $10 for a nice >> plastic card (like the ROC style cards). >> >> >> On 2/9/12, Steve Ainsworth<sainsworth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Oh…. I thought it was the “Non-TRA Guest” that was to be kept on the lanyard >>> ☺ >>> >>> Steve A >>> >>> From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Dougherty >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:27 PM >>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc:<tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions >>> >>> Club cards on a detachable >>> Lanyard :-) >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:18 PM, "AiRobert" >>> <airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> I’ll put it next to my yellow star…. >>> I don’t like it, but it’s probably good-ish. >>> RZ >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: >>> tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JACK GARIBALDI >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 5:06 PM >>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: TCC Chat >>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions >>> >>> I like the lanyard Idea >>> Jack >>> >>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S >>> >>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 4:31 PM, >>> gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> My 2 cents as well... >>> >>> >>> >>> It appears that there are 2 main points of interest in the rules >>> revisions...so far. >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Motor ignition methods - As Jack and others have said, pretty cut and dry >>> as I understand it. That said, yes, it appears that some existing >>> electronics that require break/pull wires may need to be phased out. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2. Non-HPR (i.e. uninsured persons) on the range/launch area. - Perhaps we >>> could have all HPR fliers openly display their membership cards (TRA or NAR) >>> at all times on a lanyard or clipped to their short/jacket. Also, we might >>> designate a Pad Manager or additional RSO's, as we've had at times in the >>> past, to oversee the actual pad area. This would help clarify just who is in >>> the area while charges and electronics are being armed. >>> >>> >>> >>> I think we have been pretty fortunate to have not had any serious incidents >>> at TCC launches, at least in my memory. Most times, we have plenty of help >>> at LCO and RSO and I thank those who do it on a regular and occasional >>> basis, but as the discussions over the new rules imply, we can always use >>> more "eyes on" what's happening around us. >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course these issues will continue to be discussed at future launches and >>> here on the chat so that all of us are on the same page and understand what >>> is "OK" and what is not. >>> >>> >>> >>> See you at the next launch! >>> >>> Gary Walker >>> >>> Prefect - TCC >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> >>> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4195 - Release Date: 02/07/12 >>> 20:17:00 >>> > >