That was actually my intent if I hadn't made it clear. GW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Fineberg" <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: "James Dougherty" <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 2:40:17 PM Subject: [tccrockets] Re: Club cards/Lanyards - was Re: Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions - lanyard idea The other option would be Tripoli/NAR cards (or both in my case). Then all we need is a plastic sleeve and lanyard for everyone. Sam On 2/9/2012 2:37 PM, James Dougherty wrote: > :-) > > That's funny. Well, we can get all the club members cards, but it will > cost probably $5-10 per person to make them. What do people think > about club cards? Would people be willing to pay $10 for a nice > plastic card (like the ROC style cards). > > > On 2/9/12, Steve Ainsworth<sainsworth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Oh…. I thought it was the “Non-TRA Guest” that was to be kept on the lanyard >> ☺ >> >> Steve A >> >> From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Dougherty >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:27 PM >> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc:<tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions >> >> Club cards on a detachable >> Lanyard :-) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:18 PM, "AiRobert" >> <airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> I’ll put it next to my yellow star…. >> I don’t like it, but it’s probably good-ish. >> RZ >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: >> tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JACK GARIBALDI >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 5:06 PM >> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: TCC Chat >> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions >> >> I like the lanyard Idea >> Jack >> >> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S >> >> On Feb 8, 2012, at 4:31 PM, >> gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> My 2 cents as well... >> >> >> >> It appears that there are 2 main points of interest in the rules >> revisions...so far. >> >> >> >> 1. Motor ignition methods - As Jack and others have said, pretty cut and dry >> as I understand it. That said, yes, it appears that some existing >> electronics that require break/pull wires may need to be phased out. >> >> >> >> 2. Non-HPR (i.e. uninsured persons) on the range/launch area. - Perhaps we >> could have all HPR fliers openly display their membership cards (TRA or NAR) >> at all times on a lanyard or clipped to their short/jacket. Also, we might >> designate a Pad Manager or additional RSO's, as we've had at times in the >> past, to oversee the actual pad area. This would help clarify just who is in >> the area while charges and electronics are being armed. >> >> >> >> I think we have been pretty fortunate to have not had any serious >> incidents >> at TCC launches, at least in my memory. Most times, we have plenty of help >> at LCO and RSO and I thank those who do it on a regular and occasional >> basis, but as the discussions over the new rules imply, we can always use >> more "eyes on" what's happening around us. >> >> >> >> Of course these issues will continue to be discussed at future launches and >> here on the chat so that all of us are on the same page and understand what >> is "OK" and what is not. >> >> >> >> See you at the next launch! >> >> Gary Walker >> >> Prefect - TCC >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> >> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4195 - Release Date: 02/07/12 >> 20:17:00 >>