[tccrockets] Re: Club cards/Lanyards - was Re: Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions - lanyard idea
- From: James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Sam Fineberg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:45:32 -0800
Right, good point. That's all we need. Would everyone pay for these?
On 2/9/12, Sam Fineberg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The other option would be Tripoli/NAR cards (or both in my case). Then
> all we need is a plastic sleeve and lanyard for everyone.
>
> Sam
>
> On 2/9/2012 2:37 PM, James Dougherty wrote:
>> :-)
>>
>> That's funny. Well, we can get all the club members cards, but it will
>> cost probably $5-10 per person to make them. What do people think
>> about club cards? Would people be willing to pay $10 for a nice
>> plastic card (like the ROC style cards).
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/12, Steve Ainsworth<sainsworth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Oh…. I thought it was the “Non-TRA Guest” that was to be kept on the
>>> lanyard
>>> ☺
>>>
>>> Steve A
>>>
>>> From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Dougherty
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:27 PM
>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc:<tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions
>>>
>>> Club cards on a detachable
>>> Lanyard :-)
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:18 PM, "AiRobert"
>>> <airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> I’ll put it next to my yellow star….
>>> I don’t like it, but it’s probably good-ish.
>>> RZ
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From:
>>> tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JACK GARIBALDI
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 5:06 PM
>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: TCC Chat
>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: 2012 Tripoli Rule Revisions
>>>
>>> I like the lanyard Idea
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 4:31 PM,
>>> gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gary-walker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> My 2 cents as well...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It appears that there are 2 main points of interest in the rules
>>> revisions...so far.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Motor ignition methods - As Jack and others have said, pretty cut and
>>> dry
>>> as I understand it. That said, yes, it appears that some existing
>>> electronics that require break/pull wires may need to be phased out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Non-HPR (i.e. uninsured persons) on the range/launch area. - Perhaps
>>> we
>>> could have all HPR fliers openly display their membership cards (TRA or
>>> NAR)
>>> at all times on a lanyard or clipped to their short/jacket. Also, we
>>> might
>>> designate a Pad Manager or additional RSO's, as we've had at times in the
>>> past, to oversee the actual pad area. This would help clarify just who is
>>> in
>>> the area while charges and electronics are being armed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think we have been pretty fortunate to have not had any serious
>>> incidents
>>> at TCC launches, at least in my memory. Most times, we have plenty of
>>> help
>>> at LCO and RSO and I thank those who do it on a regular and occasional
>>> basis, but as the discussions over the new rules imply, we can always use
>>> more "eyes on" what's happening around us.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course these issues will continue to be discussed at future launches
>>> and
>>> here on the chat so that all of us are on the same page and understand
>>> what
>>> is "OK" and what is not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> See you at the next launch!
>>>
>>> Gary Walker
>>>
>>> Prefect - TCC
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
>>> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4195 - Release Date: 02/07/12
>>> 20:17:00
>>>
>
>
Other related posts:
