It all depends on how much money you want to spend. The sky is the limit. On May 14, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Noralyn Ripps <nonnee1961@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any suggestions to a rebuild for Type 4 engine for my 1973 campmobile so we > can get more power? Thanks. Ripps San Antonio > > > > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android > > > From: bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx <bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx>; > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Subject: [tcb] Re: Type IV timing question > Sent: Mon, May 14, 2012 7:49:40 PM > > Yes I have used starting fluid to locate any leaks. Found a couple and > replaced the vacuum lines. > > I am using the stock VW timing scale. > > On May 14, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Mike Hayes <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Bill, >> >> Have you tried the starter fluid to find any intake leaks? Also if you >> replaced the deg scale I have heard that some of the after market deg scales >> for the type 4 are not that accurate. >> >> On 5/14/2012 11:01 AM, sammie smith wrote: >>> >>> I agree. I don't think timing is your problem. It should run good at 7.5 >>> static and it should idle with no problem at 700-750. If you have to run >>> it up to 1,000 rpm to idle smooth you have problems other than timing. >>> Don't have a good recommendation on a mechanic other than the normal ones: >>> Lyle Cherry and Doug at Qualitat. Maybe some of the DFW people can chime >>> in. >>> >>> --- On Mon, 5/14/12, Bill <bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> From: Bill <bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [tcb] Re: Type IV timing question >>> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Date: Monday, May 14, 2012, 9:37 AM >>> >>> All excellent points. Here is some more information I did not include in >>> my original email. I am running factory fuel injection. I am running a >>> stock SVDA Bosch 021 905 205P that was recently re-shimmed. The engine was >>> just rebuilt by Automotive Machine in Ft. Worth and the compression ratio >>> is stock. I run premium fuel (93 Octane). I did go with a mild cam and >>> solid lifters. The cam manufacturer indicated it would work with factory >>> FI with no issues. >>> >>> My problem I am having is that I cannot get the motor to idle at the >>> recommended 950 rpm with the timing at 7.5 BTDC. It seems like I am >>> fighting a vacuum leak that I am unable to locate. I have all new intake >>> gaskets, vacuum hoses, etc. >>> >>> It will idle at around 1100 rpm at around 10 BTDC, but that brings my max >>> advance into to the 35-38 range that I knew was too much. >>> >>> Any excellent FI mechanics around DFW want to make some extra pocket money? >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your time. >>> >>> -Bill >>> >>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, sammie smith >>> <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I agree Lonnie. To some extent it depends on compression ratio and the >>> fuel you are burning, though you should always use the premium 91/93 octane >>> in the VW engine. Daniel Watts at Oakhill, if memory serves, says max >>> 32/33. Personally I run 30 in the baja with the 2007cc and 8.5 >>> compression, and I would not want to go past 30 for everyday use on the >>> street. >>> >>> --- On Mon, 5/14/12, Lonnie & Bonnie <bergmanfamily@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> From: Lonnie & Bonnie <bergmanfamily@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Subject: [tcb] Re: Type IV timing question >>> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Date: Monday, May 14, 2012, 9:17 AM >>> >>> >>> According to Muir, never exceed 35 deg, 32 is considered best, 28 is >>> considered tame. >>> >>> From: sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Sent: Mon, May 14, 2012 8:48:09 AM >>> Subject: [tcb] Re: Type IV timing question >>> >>> Not sure for a Type IV but it shouldn't be any different than any other >>> VW/Porsche engine. Most people prefer somewhere between 28 & 30 for total >>> advance at speed. If you are running a 009 this means about 6 degrees >>> static since the 009 >>> total advance is around 22 to 24. >>> >>> --- On Mon, 5/14/12, bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx <bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> From: bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx <bbauer2000@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [tcb] Type IV timing question >>> To: "Texas Buses" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Monday, May 14, 2012, 8:30 AM >>> >>> What is the recommended total advance on a 2.0l GE code type IV motor? I >>> am not able to locate that information in the Bentley or >>> other manuals. >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2012.0.2171 / Virus Database: 2425/4998 - Release Date: 05/14/12