[tcb] Re: [Suspected Spam] Re: Re: Anyone out there wth a 1641 engine in a Westy?
- From: Will Wood <evilscientistboo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:10:04 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Not to mention that unlike VW, Chevy/GM still provides parts and support for
the Corvair engine. The local CORSA guys like to rub it in when they can go
down to the local Chevy dealer and still order engine parts for their Monzas.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Bob Perring <perring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jul 27, 2006 5:33 PM
>To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [tcb] Re: [Suspected Spam] Re: Re: Anyone out there wth a 1641
>engine in a Westy?
>
>A guy that does Corvair engine to VW vehicle conversions out in
>California is a ham radio buddy of mine. I have spoke to him about
>it, and he swears that the results are awesome.
>
>At 17:20 7/27/2006, you wrote:
>>Kennedy still makes adapters.
>>
>><http://www.kennedyeng.com/index.htm>http://www.kennedyeng.com/index.htm
>>
>>Clarke's makes bay kits and you get the corvair trans.:
>>
>>http://www.corvair.com/user-cgi/catalog.cgi?function=goto&catalog=SPECIALTY§ion=OTTO&page=OTTO-44
>>
>>There a couple guys on the type 2 list that run the conversion.
>>A friend of mine has 6 corvairs, He says corvair engines and parts
>>are not too hard to find.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Jul 27, 2006, at 4:17 PM, JKi7886155@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>>I have been reading, with interest, everyone's thoughts about
>>>engine size, performance options, etc. My two (2) beetles (one 74
>>>sedan and one 79 Super convertible) both have MoFoCo (Milwaukee)
>>>built 1776 cc "Streetwise" motors with mild cams, lightened
>>>flywheels and dual Webers. Both engines have hydraulic valve
>>>lifters and I couldn't be happier the way they perform around town
>>>or on the road. I normally cruise around 70 mph. At that speed, the
>>>VDO tachometer in my sedan reads around 4000 rpm.
>>>
>>>Back in the late 60's and early 70' s I had a 61 Westy and one time
>>>I towed a fairly heavy trailer with two (2) motorcycles from
>>>Houston to Oklahoma, to camp with a friend. Uphill, on the freeways
>>>the original stock engine had all it could do to top hills at 25
>>>mph. Drivers behind me nearly wore out their horns. After that trip
>>>I decided something had to change.
>>>
>>>I picked up a Corvair 140 H.P. engine, bought a Crown conversion
>>>kit and made the engine swap. Suddenly, I could easily dust my
>>>friend's Porche at intersections but, the engine was screaming at
>>>65-70 mph on the highway. I changed the rear end ratio and suddenly
>>>I could cruise right along with the new bay windows, in the 65-70
>>>mph range and, it still had plenty of punch. The package proved to
>>>be very dependable,. but the steering at 70 mph was so quick it
>>>felt like driving a go-kart.
>>>
>>>I sold the car to purchase my first house in around '73 but, now I
>>>sure wish I had kept it. If you want performance that's sure one
>>>way to get it, although 6 cylinder 140 H.P. Corvair engines, much
>>>less Crown adapters, are getting rare these days.
>>>
>>>Jack
>>>
>>>In a message dated 7/27/06 9:57:33 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>>>mechmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>>I agree that a Bus needs more torque, but horsepower is needed to
>>>maintain highway speeds. I have never had any problems with a 1641
>>>running hot. I use the stock offset cooler and super cool tins and
>>>maintain 190 to 205 degree's in my 70 vert with the top down
>>>blocking the air coming off the top of the car. I'm not a big fan
>>>of dual carbs, my opinion is a good 2 barrel progressive is all you
>>>need. I had a 1641 in a 65 single cab with reduction boxes with the
>>>afore mentioned setup and routinely got 28 to 32 mpg.
>>>
>>>Dan Martin <danandkatrinamartin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>I think what he is saying is for the minimal gain you get from
>>>increasing from stock to 1641, he thinks it would be better to
>>>install duel carbs and a header. The problem is, increasing
>>>displacement by increasing the bore will add horsepower, what a bus
>>>needs is more torque. To increase the torque of a VW engine the
>>>easiest way is to install a longer stroke crank. The cranks are
>>>expensive. Their use generates more heat. So most people add a oil
>>>cooler/fan and filter. I am afraid by the time I add duel carbs,
>>>header, stroker crank (why add a little stroke?), oil cooler and
>>>plumbing I will not be able stop the big heavy beast and I still will
>>>not be going fast enough to impress the kids in the high rev tuners.
>>>But at least I will get to buy a lot more gas.
>>>
>>>On Jul 27, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Trey Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> > John Connolly sent me this as I was talking to him about a 1641
>>> > with the single Weber...
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > Trey
>>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Connolly, Aircooled.Net"
>>> > <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > To: "Trey Jung" <treyjung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <type2@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:41 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: [T2] Anyone out there wth a 1641 engine in a Westy?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> http://www.aircooled.net/new-bin/viewproductdetail.php?
>>> >> keyword2=fsk0060
>>> >>
>>> >> is a far better choice. The 30mm venturis will give more power and
>>> >> run
>>> >> cooler then the supplied 27mm venturis.
>>> >>
>>> >> Read about a bus install at
>>> >> http://waitresses.servebeer.com:81/vwpage/35pdsit/35pdsit.htm
>>> >>
>>> >> John
>>> >> Aircooled.Net Inc.
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> -
>>> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE send any e-mail to: type2-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> To email the admin for list help only: type2-admin@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> For additional commands send any e-mail to: type2-help@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> Donations help keep the list going. http://www.type2.com/donate.html
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> -
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Other related posts:
