[tcb] Re: Kmart DID buy Sears!
- From: ATX <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:15:38 -0800 (PST)
That might be the first Martha Stewart mention in list history.
Additionally, an amazing response to the great discount store debate. I still
blame K-mart because of the stale bluelight popcorn.
¿This response is bus related ?
Anyone running 195/70/R15--Continental. I can't find the hankook's.
Jeff
On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:37 PM, sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well; technically it was a merger with the formation of a holding company as
the parent. The holding company is Sears Holding Co symbol SHLD. A merger is
the joining of two entities into one with usually one, but not necessarily,
emerging as the dominant entity. It could also be argued in this case that it
was a consolidation with the disappearance of both entities with the new
entity, SHLD, emerging. Since in this case it appears that Sears has emerged
as the dominant entity the normal lay person would probably argue that Sears
bought K-Mart. Since neither was really the case; SHLD acquired both. Which
is correct: well, let the academics argue it.
What it really was: Two bads merging to make one large horrible.
Is it really true that Martha Stewart is now autographing Craftsman tools?
And one more for the road: I haven't used Google since Rosie O'Donnel
suggested, in her tirade on the strike on the World Trade Center, that if you
didn't believe that steel could not burn to just Google it.
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Neil <nbmdude@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Neil <nbmdude@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [tcb] Kmart DID buy Sears!
To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 5:10 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6509683/
Google it! Damn, I wuz right!
Other related posts:
