[tcb] Re: Dual vs. Single

  • From: Julie <julie.hey.ho.lets.go@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 23:16:38 -0500

And I have no idea what 4 way prong plugs are.  I guess I will do some 
research.  

On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Duncan <whocanduncan1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you are really concerned, buy some very expensive 4-way prong plugs by NGK 
> or the like. Had a pair on my Honda going over the peak above Loveland, CO 
> and had no problem whatsoever. But I also had two pair of normal plugs in the 
> kit just in case.
> 
> Take two sets of spare plugs but don't rejet.
> 
> Duncan
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Date: 09/16/2013 9:52 PM (GMT-06:00) 
> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Subject: [tcb] Re: Dual vs. Single 
> 
> 
> Julie:  You are basically correct.  However, unless you are running some 
> large carbs, such as dual weber 44s I don't think you are going to notice the 
> difference, e.g. for a PIC 34, stock carb on late model dual ports, you might 
> notice some decrease in power at high altitudes, like 8-9,000 feet.  
> But trying to rejet the 34 to compensate is not going to help much.  If I 
> were going to drive continuously at high altitude and running weber 44s I 
> would jet them for that altitude.  I live at 350 feet above sea level and 
> jetted my 44s for that altitude.  When I made the California cruise I went 
> through altitudes as high as probably 9,000 feet.  I could detect no 
> difference in power.  Had I pulled the plugs and looked at that altitude the 
> engine was probably running a bit on the rich side.
>  
> Conclusion:  I would jet it for where you live and not worry about it.  I 
> don't know what the altitude of 
> Mt. Shasta is, but I wouldn't go through the process of changing the carb 
> jets to climb it.  If you were gonna live there at that altitude all the 
> time, then yeah.  But getting the jetting exactly correct is difficult, and 
> if you get it too lean you can burn your engine up.  Having it too rich is 
> not really gonna hurt anything.  You want to err on the rich side, not the 
> lean side.  If you have it jetted for Austin the only thing that's gonna 
> happen on Mt. Shasta is that you will be running a bit on the rich side; not 
> a problem.  If you have it jetted for the top of Mt. Shasta then you are 
> gonna be running lean at lower altitudes, not a good problem. 
>  
> What engine are you going to run and what carbs will you have on it? Maybe we 
> can be more specific on jetting.
> 
> From: Julie <julie.hey.ho.lets.go@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:39 PM
> Subject: [tcb] Dual vs. Single
> 
> I don't understand carbonation throughly. But I do know that when you take a 
> well running Bus into higher altitudes the mixture of fuel to air gets off 
> and you run rich which slows you down and can fowl your spark plugs until you 
> can cruise at a fast speed for awhile to clean the spark plugs off.  
> 
> So here is my question, would the effect be equal if one Bus had a single 
> carb on the engine as another Bus that has dual carbs?  Or would one set up 
> be more finicky or sensitive to the thinner air over the other?  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Other related posts: