[tcb] Re: Denis' front end work report

  • From: "Denis Dodson" <coocoo@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:05:05 -0600

Brian is kinda like Einstien. Einstien visualized riding a beam of light to 
figure his Theory of Relativity. But, of course, he never actually rode a beam 
of light. Brian visualizes all kinds of stuff ( going to campouts, trading his 
bus for a beetle, fixing his bus, etc.) without actually doing it Brian is not 
fettered by reality.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mark Sawyer 
  To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:26 AM
  Subject: [tcb] Re: Denis' front end work report


  Are you going to spend the day actually talking about working on buses or are 
you going to join in on giving "cool fred" a bad time for going to a non-bus 
site for advice??

  Denis Dodson <coocoo@xxxxxxx> wrote: 
    Well, this one particular driver side bleeder screw has just kicked my ass 
    for a long time and I have bled the friggin' thing at the line for way too 
    long, since changing the cylinder is so simple. I have used vice grips, 
    hammers and a torch and I just can't get it off or open. The danger is 
    shearing off the #!%^*#! thing without a repair standing by.


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: 
    To: 
    Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:16 AM
    Subject: [tcb] Re: Denis' front end work report


    > Well on a bleeder screw you want them secure. On the fronts an 11mm box 
    > wrench with a long handle does the trick usually for me.
    >
    >
    > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: "Denis Dodson" 
    > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:12:54
    > To:
    > Subject: [tcb] Re: Denis' front end work report
    >
    > Last night I had replaced only the cylinders with the bleeders. The other
    > work fine, the problem is with the bleeders being really hard (or
    > impossible) to open.
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message ----- 
    > From: 
    > To: 
    > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:03 AM
    > Subject: [tcb] Re: Denis' front end work report
    >
    >
    >> 55 through 70 there are two wheel cylinders per side on the fronts. From
    >> 54 down only one. 64 up used different wheel cylinders than 63 down
    >> except for 63 1500cc models.
    >>
    >> 53-54 used 22mm bug cylinders with symmetrical brakes as the rear from 
    >> the
    >> Ova bugs.
    >>
    >>
    >> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: "Brian Denning" 
    >> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:54:36
    >> To:tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >> Subject: [tcb] Re: Denis' front end work report
    >>
    >> there's only two brake cylinders on the front of a splittie? or did you
    >> just
    >> replace two?
    >>
    >>
    >>>From: "Denis" 
    >>>Reply-To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>>To: 
    >>>Subject: [tcb] Denis' front end work report
    >>>Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:12:34 -0500
    >>>
    >>>So, I'm sitting here, I can't do anything else until I go to the parts
    >>>house tomorrow for bleeder screws. Murray is sitting on his own tires
    >>>after
    >>>having both of his front torsion springs replaced, a new metal brake 
    >>>line,
    >>>two new front brake cylinders, and I don't know what all.
    >>>
    >>>I did all this because my passenger side was always low and my tire 
    >>>rubbed
    >>>with hard left turns or dips, or with anyone in the shotgun seat.
    >>>
    >>>After a sag of almost two inches I can report that now the sag is only
    >>>3/4". I am pissed that it isn't more level, but it is improved. I won't
    >>>know the real paractical result until I get the bleeders that were left
    >>>out
    >>>of the box with the new cylinders.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ----- Original Message -----
    >>> From: sammie smith
    >>> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:34 PM
    >>> Subject: [tcb] Re: thinkin' about a shorty
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Speaking of Denis: How's the front end work going?
    >>>
    >>> Eric Woodall wrote:
    >>> Come on Shelby, its all good man.
    >>> Just giving you a hard time, God knows I've been given a hard 
    >>> time...
    >>> And just think about Denis. Geez, nobody ever lets that guy live
    >>> anything down!
    >>> :-)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Shelby Shook wrote:
    >>> > Then I regret asking, and I probably shouldn't have appologized to
    >>>you
    >>> > either. I know I asked for opinions but there's a big difference
    >>> > between giving an honest opinion in a constructive criticising way
    >>>and
    >>> > a just completely rude way.
    >>> >
    >>> > I wont be asking a lot of advice from this forum any more.
    >>> >
    >>> > And for you other more kind people and you should know who you 
    >>> are,
    >>> > thanks for everything.
    >>> >
    >>> > -Shelby
    >>> >
    >>> >
    >>> > On 4/3/07, *Eric Woodall* > > wrote:
    >>> >
    >>> > Ya know, asking a group of bus guys if they think you should make 
    >>> a
    >>> > shorty is kinda like asking a group of PETA activists if they 
    >>> wanna
    >>> > watch while you set a cat on fire...
    >>> >
    >>> > Brian Denning wrote:
    >>> > > i can get you a 69 day camper with a corvair conversion in it 
    >>> for
    >>>1k
    >>> > > that would be ideal to shorten...it's already kind of a bastard
    >>>bus
    >>> > > anyway.
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >> From: "Jumpin' Joe Barnett" > >
    >>> > >> Reply-To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>> > >> To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>> > >> Subject: [tcb] Re: thinkin' about a shorty
    >>> > >> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:07:02 -0500
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >> Shelby, for 7000.00, you can have this..
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >>
    >>> >
    
>>>http://www.hvwc.org/html/index.php?module=photoshare&func=showimages&fid=10
    >>> >
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >> :)
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >> On 4/3/07, Andrew Barnes > > wrote:
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> I thought about making my 61 DC into a short bed wouldn't
    >>> > that be
    >>> > >>> different?
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> Just kidding , Shelby I don't know you but , It's your stuff
    >>> > so do
    >>> > >>> what
    >>> > >>> you want with it
    >>> > >>> Drew
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
    >>> > >>> *From:* Denis >
    >>> > >>> *To:* tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>> > >>> *Sent:* Monday, April 02, 2007 7:33 PM
    >>> > >>> *Subject:* [tcb] Re: thinkin' about a shorty
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> Don't get set off. I have been intrigued by a shorty. I think
    >>> > that it
    >>> > >>> would be easy. Just cut a slice off of the middle. There is no
    >>> > >>> drivetrain. I
    >>> > >>> guess you would have to use a bus that had no chance for a 
    >>> life
    >>> > >>> except as an
    >>> > >>> amputee. The weight would be more like a big Bug.
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> I would look at it like a baja.
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
    >>> > >>> *From:* Shelby Shook < sloweyefasthand@xxxxxxxxx
    >>> > >
    >>> > >>> *To:* tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>> > >>> *Sent:* Monday, April 02, 2007 7:06 PM
    >>> > >>> *Subject:* [tcb] Re: thinkin' about a shorty
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> If I wasn't serious I wouldn't have made this post. I've
    >>> > looked for
    >>> > >>> some
    >>> > >>> shortys and have only found one and it was pretty far
    >>> away...I'm
    >>> > >>> sure there
    >>> > >>> have been quite a few made but I can't find them any where. I
    >>> > don't
    >>> > >>> really
    >>> > >>> see her speeding around corners. And wouldn't you rather have
    >>> > a bus
    >>> > >>> made
    >>> > >>> into something rather than just sitting somewhere or being
    >>>crushed
    >>> > >>> so it can
    >>> > >>> sit somewhere else in pieces and not even resemble what it
    >>> > once was?
    >>> > >>> I know
    >>> > >>> I asked for your opinion and thanks for it, but the "are you
    >>> > >>> serious?" thing
    >>> > >>> kinda just set me off.
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> And hell, if she dosn't like it and it turns out impractical
    >>> > then I'll
    >>> > >>> sell it or keep it for fun.
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> peace,
    >>> > >>> Shelby
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> On 4/2/07, Eric Woodall < eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>> > > wrote:
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> > 1) They would probably make a pretty bad vehicle, cornering
    >>> > wise.
    >>> > >>> > 2) There are plenty of shorty buses that are already made
    >>> > (don't
    >>> > >>> cut up
    >>> > >>> > a
    >>> > >>> > bus to make one.)
    >>> > >>> > 3) Make sure you don't make one out of a split.
    >>> > >>> > 4) Are you serious?
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> > > I was talking to Amanda today about what car should would
    >>>like
    >>> > >>> for he
    >>> > >>> > > first
    >>> > >>> > > car, and we were thinking about VW trucks, and she really
    >>> > likes the
    >>> > >>> > double
    >>> > >>> > > cabs (who dosn't) but they're so pricey. Then we had the
    >>>great
    >>> > >>> idea of
    >>> > >>> > a
    >>> > >>> > > shorty bus. Seems like it would be a really fun project.
    >>> > Me and Dad
    >>> > >>> > could
    >>> > >>> > > save some old beat up bus and turn it into a really fun
    >>>little
    >>> > >>> shorty.
    >>> > >>> > Let
    >>> > >>> > > me know what you guy's think, I'm thinking it's a
    >>> wonderfull
    >>> > >>> idea but
    >>> > >>> > > would
    >>> > >>> > > like to know if it's really difficult to make one. Dad's a
    >>> > good
    >>> > >>> welder
    >>> > >>> > and
    >>> > >>> > > he's got the stuff to do it so I don't see any reason not
    >>> > to. Seems
    >>> > >>> > like
    >>> > >>> > > the
    >>> > >>> > > perfect car for Amanda.
    >>> > >>> > >
    >>> > >>> > > -Shelby
    >>> > >>> > >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> ------------------------------
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
    >>> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    >>> > >>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/742 - Release
    >>> Date:
    >>> > >>> 4/1/2007
    >>> > >>> 8:49 PM
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> ------------------------------
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
    >>> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    >>> > >>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/742 - Release
    >>> Date:
    >>> > >>> 4/1/2007
    >>> > >>> 8:49 PM
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
    >>> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    >>> > >>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/742 - Release
    >>> Date:
    >>> > >>> 4/1/2007
    >>> > >>> 8:49 PM
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>>
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >> --
    >>> > >> Voted Time Magazines "Person Of The Year" for 2006!
    >>> > >
    >>> > > 
    >>> _________________________________________________________________
    >>> > > Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps.
    >>> > > http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> >
    >>> >
    >>> >
    >>> >
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
    >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    >>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/745 - Release Date:
    >>>4/3/2007 12:48 PM
    >>
    >> _________________________________________________________________
    >> Download Messenger. Join the i'm Initiative. Help make a difference 
    >> today.
    >> http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_APR07
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    > 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
    > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.20/736 - Release Date: 3/27/2007
    > 4:38 PM
    >
    >
    >


    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.20/736 - Release Date: 3/27/2007 
    4:38 PM







------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/745 - Release Date: 4/3/2007 
12:48 PM

Other related posts: