[tabi] Mayday!--Stop Tech Lobbyists from Scuttling Accessible TV;We'll Help You Respond!

  • From: "Sila Miller" <silam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <fcb-l@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:24:07 -0400

AFB DirectConnect Letterhead
Mayday! Mayday!
Tech Industry Lobbyists Threatening Future of Accessible Television!
With One Email, Tell Them and the FCC What You Think!
!!!"This is not a test; this is an actual emergency"!!!
For further information, contact:
Mark Richert, Esq.
Director, Public Policy, AFB
(202) 469-6833
MRichert@xxxxxxx
Dear Advocate:
When we all celebrated the enactment of the historic Twenty-First Century 
Communications
and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) almost three years ago, we were promised by 
our
bipartisan champions on Capitol Hill, by the U.S. Congress, and the President of
the United States, that one day, things would be significantly different. We 
were
promised that the experience of people with vision loss in terms of our/their 
independence
and full participation in American life through the full and fair use of today's
most ubiquitous technologies would be forever changed.
We were thrilled to know that there would be much more video description 
available
on TV, and indeed today there is. We were gratified to know that the 
manufacturers
and service providers of some of the most commonly used communications 
technologies,
such as electronic messaging and mobile phone web browsing, would no longer be 
able
to ignore the needs of people who are blind or visually impaired. And we were 
hopeful
that emergency alerts would finally be meaningful for our community, and it 
looks
like they will be.
But we were also promised, and the new law requires, that TVs and TV-like 
equipment
would need to be fully accessible to us. Now, in what is essentially the 
proverbial
eleventh hour in the series of federal regulatory proceedings implementing the 
CVAA,
the seemingly shameless consumer electronics lobby is demanding, with implied 
threats
to go to court if they don't get their way, to strip the CVAA of its TV 
accessibility
obligations and to violate the vision of a more accessible technology society 
that
the CVAA represents.
So what do our tech lobbyist "friends" want?
Well, to answer this question, you need to know just a little bit about how the 
CVAA
works. the CVAA says that your cable or satellite provider needs to make the 
equipment,
the settop boxes and other such devices they give you to get their programming, 
accessible
to you upon your request. While this is a good thing in comparison to how things
have been, it is a compromise, and one that advocates reached with cable and 
similar
providers as a condition for their willingness to allow the CVAA to become law. 
So,
with regard to cable and satellite providers, they don't necessarily need to 
make
all, or even most, of their equipment accessible as a matter of course; they 
merely
have to accommodate your request for equipment you can use by providing you with
something, even if it is not state-of-the-art.
In contrast, the CVAA requires that TVs and TV-like equipment, essentially 
anything
that receives or plays back video programming of any kind, a ton of very cool 
technology
out there, must be accessible by default; TVs and TV-like equipment will only be
allowed to be inaccessible in a given instance if, and only if, fairly strict 
legal
exceptions apply. This means that, unlike the cable and satellite sector which 
may
regularly traffic in inaccessible equipment so long as they can ultimately give 
us
something we can use upon our request, makers of TVs and TV-like equipment are 
charged
with the clear responsibility to fundamentally change their behavior in a way 
that
would exponentially increase the commercial retail availability of the 
accessible
and most popular video-related consumer electronics on the market.
Ok, but what are those lobbyists up to?
With forked-tongued craftiness, the consumer electronics lobby is, even as we 
speak,
assuring the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of industry's commitment to
the needs of people with disabilities while, without blushing, propounding some 
of
the most contorted legal reasoning that we have seen yet. They are using the 
full
weight of their over-indulged influence to pressure the FCC into applying the 
inferior,
more limited cable and satellite requirements to TVs and TV-like equipment.
If these "friends" of ours in the tech lobby get their way, rather than being 
able
to shop for the digital TV or other video player you want and to have a robust 
array
of choices just like everyone else, you will be forced to beg for an accessible 
product
directly from the manufacturer. Rather than being able to enjoy the product you 
want
to buy, you may even be expected to live with an inferior model, if you can get 
an
accessible inferior model at all. Why are the tech lobbyists proposing this 
manifestly
unfair arrangement? quite simply, their scheme would let their client companies 
off
the hook for doing the right thing but leave consumers with little recourse.
What can you do?
Right now, the FCC is accepting comments from the public about how to implement 
the
CVAA's TV and cable and satellite equipment requirements. AFB will help you 
voice
your concern if you will take just a moment or two and write your thoughts in an
email to us; AFB will file your comments for you. No, AFB's name will not be on 
your
comments; your comments will be your own. We are simply offering to make the 
process
as easy for you as possible because this issue is so uniquely critical.
The FCC's electronic comment filing system is not the easiest system to use, and
any comments filed need to include certain technical legal references. Send an 
email
to:
TV@xxxxxxx
We will be glad to add the technical pro forma details for you and to submit 
your
comments on your behalf for the official record.
So what exactly do you need to do?
All you need to do to help get things back on the right track is the following:
1: Write an email of whatever length you wish stating in polite but pointed 
fashion
that begging for an accessible TV or similar equipment directly from a 
manufacturer
is categorically unacceptable to you. Tell the FCC that it was the obvious 
intention
of Congress, and it is the expectation of people who are blind or visually 
impaired
across America, that accessible TVs and TV-like equipment will be readily and 
regularly
available at commercial retail stores. Remind the FCC that the so-called "upon 
request"
compromise that we reached with the cable and satellite industries neither 
involved
the consumer electronics lobby at the time nor applies to their client companies
now. Tell the FCC that people with vision loss will not stand for the consumer 
electronics
lobby's proposed gutting of one of the most popular and important parts of the 
CVAA.
Tell the FCC your own story of frustrations trying to simply adjust the volume 
or
channels on your equipment, to simply play a show or movie, to find and activate
your TV's video description controls, and to otherwise make full use of your TV 
or
TV-like equipment.
2: At the conclusion of the text of your email, be absolutely certain to type 
your
first and last name, followed by your regular mailing address. When we properly 
format
and file your comments, the FCC needs to know that you are a real person, and 
your
comments must be accompanied by more than your email address; they must include 
a
regular identifying mailing address. It is up to you to decide which of the 
addresses
that you might be associated with you want to use, a home, work, or some other 
appropriate
address. So long as your email includes both your full name and a real related 
address,
your comments will be accepted as part of the official record. Don't worry about
anything else; we will be sure to fill out the rest of the required information,
such as the docket number for this proceeding and similar formalities.
3: Between now and Monday, August 5, send your email to:
TV@xxxxxxx
and simply begin the text of your email with the greeting, "To whom it may 
concern."
A simple "Sincerely" or "Respectfully" at the conclusion of your message and 
before
your full name and address will be fine.
Once we receive your email, we will properly format it and submit it to the FCC.
The deadline for all comments is Wednesday, August 7. However, given that we 
hope
and expect that we will receive a considerable number of comments, please send 
us
your email comments no later than Monday, August 5 or as soon as you possibly 
can.
Thank you in advance for your advocacy, keep hope alive, and please share this 
call
to action widely.

Other related posts:

  • » [tabi] Mayday!--Stop Tech Lobbyists from Scuttling Accessible TV;We'll Help You Respond! - Sila Miller