[tabi] Re: I have an idea for TCB, NFB, and the Lighthouse

  • From: "Yvonne Britton" <ladyvwithlove@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:40:42 -0500

I think this would be a good idea Chip. I am saying this from my own experience 
with FAAST. I went to them and ask for a loan so I could purchase a new 
computer and they said that I should not want to get myself in debt. I feel 
like if I want to borrow money for something I need to better myself I should 
be the one who can decide if I can afford it or not. . Things that we how are 
 in the blind
 community need things that are too expensive and if we can not get a loan to 
buy something I think is very wrong. You should have the mind to decide if you 
can afford what ever you might need. We have this organization and we deserve a 
chance.There some of us who don't have jobs but we do have a income so 
therefore we should have a chance to get what we need. I myself am tried of 
putting my money in a refurbish computer and there are other things I need. So 
people give us a chance.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chip Orange 
  To: tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:57 PM
  Subject: [tabi] I have an idea for TCB, NFB, and the Lighthouse

  hi all,

  I had an idea I hoped the leaders of our 3 big non-profits here in town would 
take up; I think it's worth doing, and it would give us something else to focus 
on besides the bus system, which is more than a little divisive.

  What I've noticed is that when I'm speaking with many blind people, and I 
mention a possible technical solution to a problem they're having, their 
response is often something like "that would be great, but I can't afford it."

  understandable of course; we all know assistive technology is expensive, and 
we need a lot of it.

  so, what if for this area of Florida served by the Lighthouse, we began a 
fund to which we all contributed, which was then used to provide no interest 
loans for the purchase of assistive technology?

  I was hoping one group would take on the administration of the fund, and all 
3 groups would contribute to it, or fund raise for it, as a joint project.  
I'll offer to start it off with $100 if someone will take it on.

  I also hoped the fund could be run in such a way that a person's need for the 
technology, or their ability to pay, would not be a factor in receiving the 
loan.    I'd like this to be as free from value judgments as possible.  Perhaps 
just as the person what payment schedule they thought that they could afford.

  a lot of microbanks in very poor areas of the world are quite successful, 
with nearly 100% payback rates, when being run like this, by simply requiring a 
family member or friend to cosign the loan application, guaranteeing payback if 
the primary applicant fails to do so.  this seems to serve as a screening tool 
(if you can't produce one person who will vouch that you will pay back a loan, 
then it's likely that you won't), and also as a real incentive for the 
applicant to pay-back the loan (not wanting their friend or family to have to 
do so).

  I'd also suggest, to help those taking on the administration of the fund, 
that they do nothing if payments are missed.  we'll make up losses through fund 
raising.  when you're freed of the effort of collections, then the 
administration should be a very minor task.

  so, what do people think?  will the leaders of these groups be willing to 
discuss it amongst themselves?



  Chip Orange
  Database Administrator
  Florida Public Service Commission

  (850) 413-6314

   (Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily reflect those of the Florida Public Service Commission.)

Other related posts: