To all on list,I have noticed several times that many drivers assume that all lights are turn on red and do so, even when a sign specifically says no turn on red. There are a lot of thoughtless and impaired drivers out there. Some are drunk and some don't have good eyesight but don't realize it yet. We all have to be super careful all the time.
Barbara Lineberry----- Original Message ----- From: "Allison and Chip Orange" <acorange@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 5:22 PM Subject: [tabi] Re: Bringing all the issues together Thank you Erica, and don't worry about my toes, they are fine!!! I would like to mention, that your points 3, 4, and 6 are quite true, and good points, but StarMetro may argue that drivers will learn; law enforcement will change. in my opinion, this doesn't help the problem much; the problem of many mobility impaired and blind, who lack adequate skills in crossing large busy intersections. we will have a never-ending supply of such people, as more people lose their eye-sight. and audible signals are a help, but not a panacea, as they cannot take into consideration such unpredictable events as right turns on red, which may be the single largest source of danger. Therefore, I believe it's fair to say, and O&M instructors should certainly be consulted for their opinions on this, that it simply cannot be said to be safe for a blind person to cross a large busy intersection, especially when it allows right turns on red. there is nothing that can be done to the intersection or the drivers that will improve matters, and I'm concerned that the phrasing of your points 3, 4, and 6 may imply that there is. and now, StarMetro is proposing 41 such danger zones be made part of our daily lives. therefore, I think a 7th point is in order: "Many disabled individuals will never attain independent travel skills to allow them to cross large busy intersections safely, nor will the physical impairments of some ever allow for it. We therefore need the ability to transfer without crossing through dangerous intersections or parking lots." Another point I'd like to see added: many blind individuals have had quite a lot of time invested with them, by O&M instructors, who have helped them learn their way to the bus stops they need to use. now, due to Nova 2010, all bus stops are moving, and these people will all need such assistance and/or training again; all at once. this isn't going to be possible, especially when you consider many cases have since closed, and so there's no easy way to get such training paid for, nor do we have adequate instructor resources. therefore, we need ways to make it easier to locate bus stops both from quite a distance out, and when very close. I understand tactile bumps on the sidewalks have been proposed, and they are certainly helpful; but I believe we need more assistance. this would include lit bus stops to aid those with low vision, and possibly a technical aid such as the "SoundPost" or other location system, designed to guide blind individuals towards the bus stop. thank you again, and Kevin, for your work in communicating these points to everyone involved. Chip -----Original Message----- From: tabi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tabi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ericamccaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 3:49 PM To: tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [tabi] Re: Bringing all the issues together Here is a starting list pursuant to Kevin's request: Nova 2010 Pros: 1. More frequent buses. 2. Lengthened hours of operation on Sundays. (This also mandates lengthened hours of Dial-a-Ride service on Sundays.) 3. Minimal difference between daytime and night/Sunday coverage. 4. Some people get a considerably more direct route to their primary destinations. Nova 2010 Cons*: 1. Increased walking distances to/from points of origin/destination and bus stops. 2. Many of these walking routes are along major roadways with inadequate, incomplete, or no sidewalks. 3. Transferring buses may require crossing one or both multi-lane thoroughfares at major intersection heretofore unaccustomed, due to their heavy traffic flow, to pedestrians. 4. Tallahassee is NOT a pedestrian-friendly city. Drivers lack consequences for law-breaking. 5. Some people will have to transfer more than once to reach their destination (or will have to transfer once, where before they had a direct route). Walking further and waiting on connections will offset the time-saving benefit of higher bus frequencies. 6. The goodwill alone of StarMetro, Public Works, TPD and/or other City entities in no way guarantees public safety. Grants are wonderful... ONCE RECEIVED AND IMPLEMENTED, but provide no protection before then. * It should be noted that the Cons cannot be completely assessed by many riders or potential riders because the route descriptions provided to date do not reference where bus routes cross. Therefore, riders may not have an understanding of how they would get from point A to point B, and which intersection crossings would be required. IN SUMMARY: Many on TABI who have voiced their opinions seem to be open to the concept of a grid-type system. However, a nearly universal, overwhelming concern seems to be the desire of StarMetro to barrel ahead with this plan before travel routes to, from and between buses are as safe as possible. If there's no money for sidewalks, audible signals and the like, then the project should be postponed. Nova 2010 should not be implemented until the safety improvements are complete at all transfer points. -----Original Message----- From: daviska9 <daviska9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sun, Nov 8, 2009 1:09 pm Subject: [tabi] Bringing all the issues together Good Afternoon All, I have been monitoring the discussions for and against NOVA 2010, first through Laurie, and now I have joined TABI. I wonder if some of you would be willing to help me get all of the points, both pro and con, put together in one posting. I will then forward that to the Transportation Advisory Committee(TAC), of which I am a part. The TAC is very interested in the safety issues involved, and have been reviewing these even before NOVA 2010 was presented to us. We are a part of the city commission, and not a part of StarMetro. We are due to make a recommendation one way or the other to the commission after the first of the year, and I want to make sure all of the information that can be is put on the table. I may not be perfect, but I am trying to be neutral and represent the interests if the visually impaired on the TAC. You should know that the new system provides Laurie and I with some VERY positive benefits. That interest is only one piece that I present to the TAC. If you are willing, a consolidated list of your views would be very helpful to me. Let me know what you think. There is a little known "be attitude" Blessed be the flexible, for they will bend and not breakJ. Hope to hear from you all soon Kevin Davis Check out the TABI resource web page at http://acorange.home.comcast.net/TABI and please make suggestions for new material. if you'd like to unsubscribe you can do so through the freelists.org web interface, or by sending an email to the address tabi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject.Check out the TABI resource web page at http://acorange.home.comcast.net/TABI
and please make suggestions for new material.if you'd like to unsubscribe you can do so through the freelists.org web interface, or by sending an email to the address tabi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject.
Check out the TABI resource web page at http://acorange.home.comcast.net/TABI and please make suggestions for new material. if you'd like to unsubscribe you can do so through the freelists.org web interface, or by sending an email to the address tabi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject.