*i made sure i put him in his place
Nikolai Nielsen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Nikolai Nielsen <
nielsen.nikolai86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
this was my response to this cretin btw, i made sure to but him in his
place without stooping to his level:
Oooh I think I now know where your ignorance is coming from. You are
thinking of hand rammed powder motors. you evidently have never heard of
these types of motors, here is probably one of the easiest references you
can find made by the master of amateur experimental rocketry, Richard
Nakka, if you haven't heard of him yet, why the hell am I even having this
conversation with you. (http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/pvcmot4.html
<https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nakka-rocketry.net%2Fpvcmot4.html&event=comments&redir_token=TkXkKbwZSnizEUYy8HZGFiGaYLx8MTUyMTEyMzg5OEAxNTIxMDM3NDk4>
http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/pvcmot5.html
<https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nakka-rocketry.net%2Fpvcmot5.html&event=comments&redir_token=TkXkKbwZSnizEUYy8HZGFiGaYLx8MTUyMTEyMzg5OEAxNTIxMDM3NDk4>
http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/pvcmot6.html
<https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nakka-rocketry.net%2Fpvcmot6.html&event=comments&redir_token=TkXkKbwZSnizEUYy8HZGFiGaYLx8MTUyMTEyMzg5OEAxNTIxMDM3NDk4>
http://www.nakka-rocketry.net/pvcmot7.html)
<https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nakka-rocketry.net%2Fpvcmot7.html%29&event=comments&redir_token=TkXkKbwZSnizEUYy8HZGFiGaYLx8MTUyMTEyMzg5OEAxNTIxMDM3NDk4>
and by the way, the total cost of the finished motor, when converted to
dollars, is 0,93 US Dollars.
If you even cared to observe, the left over fuel was NOT poured down the
drain, it was scraped off and burned right after. the residue you see on
the spatula was a very small amount that was couldn't be removed and was
not worth removing. "considering the massive customization of pvc pieces",
sigh, you are aware that customized parts=more cost. i used a single piece
of pressure rated pvc pipe=minimal cost. "Poorly thought out process, bad
design, excess parts, longer build time."- if this was true, then why did
Richard Nakka, the most well known figure in experimental rocketry and has
been building experimental rockets since the 1980's, have this to say about
my tutorial: (this is an extract from an email he sent me after watching
this tutorial) "I viewed your tutorial video, there are many things about
it that I like. It is well made, you clearly put a lot of effort and
thought into it, and you provide instructions in an orderly well-explained
manner (sadly, a rare quality when it comes to You tube videos). And I can
tell you have a lot of experience under your belt with PVC rocket motor
making. You present a lot of good ideas (your dessicator is better than
mine, I'll have to get one of those rubber sealed containers)." -Richard
Nakka bottom line: think before you speak and do your research before
criticizing my work again.
Nikolai Nielsen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Nikolai Nielsen <
nielsen.nikolai86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
" I think it is crazy to make it indoors on a stove top" well I don't
really have any options for that, its either do it inside on the stove or
outside on a gas burner.
Nikolai Nielsen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Bill Kuker <bkuker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eh, they usually say "Don't read the comments," and it's true about
everything on the internet. Just keep improving your motors, your videos
and your understanding. :)
(And maybe your safety. I think it is crazy to make it indoors on a
stove top, but I'll try not to be a jerk about it in the comments)
-Bill
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Nikolai Nielsen <
nielsen.nikolai86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
wait it didnt want to send the whole thing:
ninjarawr21 <https://www.youtube.com/user/ninjarawr21>7 hours ago
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEyk-Mj1xHU&lc=Ugzz8JCPicaXj-SJtNl4AaABAg.8dkYta3YIwW7------3Wf->
Simply look up on youtube: How To Make "Screw-Lock" Sugar Rockets. It
is one of many examples you can look up where you can create 5" engine
systems, for less than a dollar each, especially if you order everything
online. Aside from that, you can customize your own nozzles for motors in a
modular fashion, considering the massive customization of pvc pieces. In
the same note, it is easily done whether or not the you want to scale up to
larger sizes, and if you desire a custom thrust nozzle, simply build it by
ratio. All things aside from rocket design, it's an atrocity that you
simply run your left over rocket fuel through your plumbing system. You
have no concept of all the compounds that potassium nitrate alone can react
with in a terrible way - alcohol for example, and in your plumbing system,
it's easy for fermentation to happen and a simple alcohol + potassium
nitrate reaction would turn your plumbing system into a bomb/rocket. Let
alone that possible destruction later on, it's harmful for the environment.
If you don't care about your plumbing, nor the environment, to avoid being
a wasteful idiot, you can simply recrystallized your hard material attached
to any tool in the next fuel mixture you make, being it'll be easy to
remove it during the heating process. Basic chemistry. Bottom line: Poorly
thought out process, bad design, excess parts, longer build time. The only
thing good about this is that you added the iron oxide. Every piece is
sloppy. You repeatedly say, "It doesn't have to be perfect." I call
bullshit. Amateur.
Nikolai Nielsen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Nikolai Nielsen <
nielsen.nikolai86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i just received this comment on my sugar rocket motor tutorial video (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEyk-Mj1xHU&lc=z235c5ljpoza
ypgsracdp43bny2ccz2iamybyd2hov5w03c010c) and am aghast at what he
said. is this guy just ignorant or stupid? can you guys please help me out
and reply to this guy, especially you guys that are much more well known(
richard, james, rick etc.). this is what he said:
ninjarawr21 <https://www.youtube.com/user/ninjarawr21>
This is nearly the worst version I've ever seen of making an r-candy
rocket motor, of any kind. Many times more work, doing it this way, than
almost any other. Tedious for no reason.
Home Grown Pyrotechnics
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1mXYqkcmdupZ41hDq18U1g>
ninjarawr21 this uses much fewer parts than any other tutorial I've
seen and costs less than any I've seen. Show me a video that is less work
and in the same amount of detail as this video.
ninjarawr21 <https://www.youtube.com/user/ninjarawr21>7 hours ago
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEyk-Mj1xHU&lc=Ugzz8JCPicaXj-SJtNl4AaABAg.8dkYta3YIwW7------3Wf->
Simply look up on youtube: How To Make "Screw-Lock" Sugar Rockets. It
is one of many examples you can look up where you can create 5" engine
systems, for less than a dollar each, especially if you order everything
online. Aside from that, you can customize your own nozzles for motors in
a
modular fashion, considering the massive customization of pvc pieces. In
the same note, it is easily done whether or not the you want to scale up
to
larger sizes, and if you desire a custom thrust nozzle, simply build it by
ratio. All things aside from rocket design, it's an atrocity that you
simply run your left over rocket fuel through your plumbing system. You
have no concept of all the compounds that potassium nitrate alone can
react
with in a terrible way - alcohol for example, and in your plumbing system,
it's easy for fermentation to happen and a simple alcohol + potassium
nitrate reaction would turn your plumbing system into a bomb/rocket. Let
alone that possible destruction later on, it's harmful for the
environment.
If you don't care about your plumbing, nor the environment, to avoid being
a wasteful idiot, you can simply recrystallized your hard material
attached
to any tool in the next fuel mixture you make, being it'll be easy to
remove it during the heating process. Basic chemistry. Bottom line: Poorly
thought out process, bad design, excess parts, longer build time. The only
thing good about this is that you added the iron oxide. Every piece is
sloppy. You repeatedly say, "It doesn't have to be perfect." I call
bullshit. Amateur.
