[skycastle-commits] SF.net SVN: skycastle: [231] trunk/skycastle/modules/core/src/main/java/org /skycastle/core/Actor.java
- From: zzorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: skycastle-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:11:13 -0700
Revision: 231
http://skycastle.svn.sourceforge.net/skycastle/?rev=231&view=rev
Author: zzorn
Date: 2007-10-06 23:11:13 -0700 (Sat, 06 Oct 2007)
Log Message:
-----------
A comment
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/skycastle/modules/core/src/main/java/org/skycastle/core/Actor.java
Modified:
trunk/skycastle/modules/core/src/main/java/org/skycastle/core/Actor.java
===================================================================
--- trunk/skycastle/modules/core/src/main/java/org/skycastle/core/Actor.java
2007-10-07 06:08:38 UTC (rev 230)
+++ trunk/skycastle/modules/core/src/main/java/org/skycastle/core/Actor.java
2007-10-07 06:11:13 UTC (rev 231)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
// REFACTOR: Maybe rename to something else, Actor is a bit close to Action,
but Actor really also has Sensors and other controlled Actors.
// Maybe something that is similar to Controller? Controllable? Controlled?
// Or just descriptive, like Avatar or Agent (is there something not starting
with an a?)
-// Or maybe it could be Entity? That would also make it more straightforward
for the action to get access to all the data it needs.
+// Or maybe it could be Entity? Or GameObject? That would also make it more
straightforward for the action to get access to all the data it needs.
// IDEA: Different Controllers might have different access levels to the
Actor, so we should perhaps
// supply a reference to the (originating?) controller when making requests?
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the
world's largest Open Source development site.
Other related posts:
- » [skycastle-commits] SF.net SVN: skycastle: [231] trunk/skycastle/modules/core/src/main/java/org /skycastle/core/Actor.java
