[SimpleMail-usr] Re: Happy New Year to one and all. SimpleMail 0.30 released???
- From: Kulwant Bhogal <kulwant.bhogal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: simplemail-usr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 07 Jan 2007 11:45:30 +0100
Hi Sebastian,
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Bauer [mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 07/01/2007 09:41:02
To:
Subject: [SimpleMail-usr] Re: Happy New Year to one and all. SimpleMail 0.30
released???
>> Would it be possible to have all the latest fixes in SimpleHTML but with
>> the fast scrolling for CGX4 as it was in SimpleHTML0.19?
> I still think there is something weird in your config. However, an idea
> would be to add an envarc option which disables the double buffering.
Many thanks for your reply.
That might be a good idea - unless you can spot what may be causing the
trouble from the information below.
I'm running OS3.9 on a BlizzardPPC with a BVision GFX card using CGX4.2. I
am running no other hacks/patches etc - only official software.
My CGX Env vars are:
Alertmenu 1
Hide15bit 1
SuperGels 1
WBPatSpeedup 1
HiResCrsr 1
Plane2Fast 1
Superlayers 1
ForceChunky 1
NoPassThrough 0
CPUP2C 0
KeepAmigaVideo 0
SaveMem 0
UseSemaphores 0
CGX Tooltypes are:
BITMAPCACHE Y
BOOTLOGO Y
Packed24 N
ScrollMask N
PassThrough N
Is there anything which looks untoward?
I don't get any other problems with double/triple buffering in other
apps/games etc - eveything runs fine - even video playback.
What is the difference between the scrolling routines called by SimpleHTML
0.19 vs later ones? Are they CGX double buffering routines?
Kind regards,
Kulwant
__________________________________________________________________________
SimpleMail mailing list - //www.freelists.org/list/simplemail-usr
Listserver help.: mailto:simplemail-usr-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP
Unsub....: mailto:simplemail-usr-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
Other related posts:
