The problem with this approach is that a good S-parameter model has the very same behavior as the simple capacitor model. If the S-parameter model doesn't show the same charging effect then I question the validity of that model. I believe you could make an S-parameter model that would accurately represent the high frequency impedance of the capacitor and avoid the low frequency charging, but it would take care and understanding to generate that model. S-parameters are like power tools. A skilled craftsman can get a lot of work done with them, but in an unskilled hand they can do a lot of damage. My preference for the series capacitor problem is to use a resistor with the value of the capacitive reactance at the bit frequency of the signal on the channel. Weston -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of prathap sirishe Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:49 AM To: Andy Haas Cc: Newbie Pugal; Roopesh Badala; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors in topology Hello Roopesh, I remember facing same issue before. From what I recollect, apart from all the solutions mentioned so far, you can try to generate a s-parameter model for an ac coupled differential trace pair using another simulation tool like Hyperlynx and use the resultant ".s4p" file in Cadence tool set, replacing differential trace segment with 4-port s-parameter model. Hope this helps! Regards, Prathap On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Andy Haas <andyhaas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi guys, > > There should be no issue in simulating nets with series caps within > the Cadence SI environment. Initial conditions can also be used if you > use the right model. Feel free to contact me offline and I'd be happy to help. > > Regards, > Andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Newbie Pugal > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:50 AM > To: Roopesh Badala; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors > in topology > > Hi Roopesh, > I have faced similar problem in the past and went to cadence for the > support but did not worked out. With the AC caps in the cadence the P > and N waveforms will not come as expect. Later I simulated using > HSPICE with initial condition settings or else you need to run a long > bits for the settled waveforms. > > Regards > Pugal > > > ________________________________ > From: Roopesh Badala <roopesh.badala@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, 8 July 2011 4:54 PM > Subject: [SI-LIST] trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors in > topology > > Hi All, > I am trying to simulate a topology which has AC coupling capacitors in it. > > Using Cadence Allegro PCB SI tool set , i am unable to get the > expected output. > > but when I simulate the same topology by removing the AC coupling > capacitors in signal path, I get a perfect waveform. > > Is this a tool limitation..? can some body suggest me if they have > faced similar issue. > > > Thank you > > Roopesh > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu