[SI-LIST] tolerance on components

  • From: jan.vercammen1@xxxxxxxx
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:39:09 +0200

hi si-list,

I am looking for  information on tolerance of SMD capacitors, to be
more specific the: the (probability) distribution of component values.

I remember - maybe incorrectly - that this subject has been already
discussed on the si-list. I have searched the archive, but without succes.

I have been working on a RF matching circuit with lumped components.
The tolerances on the inductors and capacitorshave been selected as 5%

From simulations I know that certain capacitors values are more senstive 
than 
others and I use multiple parallel capacitors to improve on the tolerance.
(the frequency is low enough to allow for parrallel parts).

All capacitors used are generic 0603 generic series  50V, NPO or COG,
were one can select the the tolerance from 1, 2 or 5%. However, not all 
values
of 1 or 2% are readily available and we use 5% as a standard  in our 
database.
Our boards are assembled by an external partner and the components
are acquired from various sources - buying a generic part.

However, I can imagine that capacitor  manufacturers select 1 and 2% 
tolerance
parts and sell the rest as 5% parts (discarding parts or as 10%) . Which 
means that 
the distribution is not necessarily normal, but maybe normal with a gap in 
the middle.

Is my reasoning correct? Has anyone ever observed this kind of 
distributions?


Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind Regards,

Jan Vercammen | Agfa HealthCare
EMI specialist | HE/A&D / ELEC2
T  +32 3444 6233 | F  +32 3 444 6268

Agfa HealthCare NV, Septestraat 27, 2640 Mortsel, Belgium
http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/
R.O.: Septestraat 27, B-2640 Mortsel, Belgium | RLE Antwerp | VAT BE 
0403.003.524 | IBAN Operational Account BE81363012356224 | IBAN Customer 
Account BE20375104592856 | ING Belgium NV, B-1000 Brussels
Click on link to read important disclaimer: 
http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/maildisclaimer

__________________

hi si-list,


I need help on the resistivity of copper tracks of a 2-layer PCB

It concerns a RFID reader with a loop antenna operating at 13.56MHz.

I have measured the loop impedance as 2uH + 7Ohm

I have simulated the loop with FastHeny as 2uH + 4.6Ohm using w=150um and 
t=35um and sigma=30e6

I have been using for the resitivity of copper  34nS/m, the double of the 
textbook value of 17nS/m
of pure copper (or 50% of the textbook conductivity)

A reference (manual LC Cray) quotes the PCB conductivity as 30-70% of the 
conductivity of pure copper.

If I repeat the simulation with sigma=20e6 (or about 30%) then the result 
match better or about 6.4Ohm.

Next I measured (optically) the track width (there are 4 loops, w=150um 
and separation = 125um):
        - the two outer tracks are consistently thinner, about 120um (at 
the top)
        - the two central tracks are about 140um (at the top)
        - they seem to be trapezoid, the top is less wide than the base, 
the base seems to be right on 150um for the inner tracks
        and about 140um for the outer tracks
        - registration is very good
With this information and using thinner tracks (average of about 130um) 
the resistance turns out about 6.7Ohm

I assume that the trapezium shape could have more loss than a rectangular 
bar ...

So can I assume that the conductivity of PCB tracks is about 30% of that 
of pure copper or is the variation
much larger (between PCB manufacturers)? 

As the skin effect is completey developped at 13.56MHz I would assume that 
the loop resistance would be proportional to
the sqaure root of the resistivity because the skin depth is proportional 
to the square root of the resistivity and the resistance
is proportional to resistivity/skin_depth ... or is this argumentation 
incorrect?

I am asking this because I have to match the RF generator to the loop and 
reading range is very sensitive
to good matching of both the inductance and the resistance ... the latter 
is a problem because it seems more prone
to variation

There is also a temperature effect. Can I use the coeff of pure copper as 
an approximation?
 

Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind Regards,

Jan Vercammen | Agfa HealthCare
EMI specialist | HE/A&D / ELEC2
T  +32 3444 6233 | F  +32 3 444 6268

Agfa HealthCare NV, Septestraat 27, 2640 Mortsel, Belgium
http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/
R.O.: Septestraat 27, B-2640 Mortsel, Belgium | RLE Antwerp | VAT BE 
0403.003.524 | IBAN Operational Account BE81363012356224 | IBAN Customer 
Account BE20375104592856 | ING Belgium NV, B-1000 Brussels
Click on link to read important disclaimer: 
http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/maildisclaimer

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: