Hi steve, My board is slow, 32 mhz and it is a 5 slot board with connector only (hm hard metric connector). it is kind of CPCI board. my question was when I measured the bused impedance , it( the software that i used) didn't ask me how long the length of my trace and where will be the device / stub. so in what basic /equation it calculated the impedance, which is low compare to single end impedance measurement. could anyone explain me the equation behind it!! Thanks. taskina --- Steve Weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andy, that is certainly possible. Perhaps Taskina > can clarify his situation. > > Regards, > > > Steve > At 11:31 AM 2/17/2005 -0500, Andrew Ingraham wrote: > > > Taskina, what you are witnessing is the energy > that couples between your > > > lines as crosstalk. If you move the lines > further apart, the impedance > > > will rise back towards the impedance of a single > line. > > > >Depends on what he means by "bussed." > > > >The above answer is correct if he means the trace > is just one trace in the > >middle of a wider bus (several traces in parallel), > and the traces are close > >together. > > > >But "bussed" could also mean that he has a single > trace that gets bussed > >from one device to another to another. That's what > I thought he meant, and > >might make more sense considering how much smaller > his impedance got. > > > >In that case, you have some capacitive loading at > each device along the way, > >and this is what reduces the effective (also called > "loaded") characteristic > >impedance. This effect should be described in any > good textbook description > >about characteristic impedances of traces with > devices attached. > > > >A simple way to think about it is this: The raw > trace (without devices > >attached to it) has some capacitance per unit > length and some inductance per > >unit length. The characteristic impedance equals > the square root of the > >inductance (per length) divided by the capacitance > (per length). By adding > >devices (or stubs) to the trace, you've increased > the average (effective) > >capacitance per unit length by some amount, and > from that you can > >re-calculate the effective characteristic > impedance. > > > >It makes sense to think of it this way when the > distance between adjacent > >devices on the "bus" is much less than a wavelength > at your frequencies of > >interest, so that the effect of adjacent loads > blends together. At higher > >frequencies or bigger distances between loads where > that is no longer true, > >it is better to treat the trace as having the > original (unloaded) > >characteristic impedance with a discontinuity at > every device. > > > >If you are going to simulate the trace, use the > larger unloaded > >characteristic impedance and make sure to include a > model for each attached > >device, with its capacitance. > > > >The time to use the loaded bus characteristic > impedance, is when doing > >back-of-the-envelope calculations about the > effective load seen by the > >driver. You could use it in simulations too, but > only if your simulation > >doesn't include the capacitance of each attached > device, and only if you are > >sure the frequencies are low enough so that the > loaded trace "looks" > >continuous. > > > >Regards, > >Andy > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ > >To unsubscribe from si-list: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in > the Subject field > > > >or to administer your membership from a web page, > go to: > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > >For help: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the > Subject field > > > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > >List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.org > > > >List archives are viewable at: > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >or at our remote archives: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are > viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > The weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx e-mail address will terminate > March 31, 2005. > Please update your address book with > weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in > the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go > to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the > Subject field > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are > viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu