Venkat, it's a simple RC relation. MOSFET's have a positive tempco of resistivity. Steve. At 12:25 PM 5/23/2005 -0500, Satagopan, Venkat Raghavan \(UMR-Student\) wrote: >I guess I am missing something about this thread. >My understanding from few of the threads is that=20 >Increase temperature leads to more number of electrons in conduction = >band >Increased temperature leads to reduction in threshold voltage Vt of say = >MOSFET. >Reduction of Vt would increase the switching speed of the device making = >it faster. >=20 >So how would reducing the temperature to liquid nitrogen levels make the = >device work two to three times faster. >Kindly help me clear my confusion. >Thanks >Venkat >=20 > >________________________________ > >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Tom Dagostino >Sent: Mon 5/16/2005 6:51 PM >To: arpad.muranyi@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > > > > From the Handbook of Physics > >Semiconductors..."At absolute zero the ideal structure is an insulator. = >At >elevated temperatures, electrons can be thermally excited from the = >valence >band to the conduction band, giving intrinsic conductivity from equal = >number >of conduction electrons and holes....." > >Tom Dagostino >Teraspeed Labs >13610 SW Harness Lane >Beaverton, OR 97008 >503-430-1065 >http://www.teraspeed.com >tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC >121 North River Drive >Narragansett, RI 02882 >401-284-1827 > >Teraspeed is the registered service mark of >Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > >-----Original Message----- >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:02 PM >To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > > >Thanks for the two responses to my question from Lynne, and Chris. > >Let me recap the thread, and restate my question, because I don't >feel that it was completely answered yet. > >The thread started with the question on what happens with silicon >semiconductor devices below -55 C. A response came back to say >that at 77 K silicon will act as an insulator. Someone else >responded that this was not the case. Then the previous writer >corrected themselves saying that they were referring to pure >silicon being an insulator at such low temperatures. > >This is when I asked my question. I may have read too much into >the thread, but it seemed to imply that PURE silicon is an insulator >at those low temperatures, but less of an insulator at higher >temperatures, such as room temperature. This surprised me. > >I am certainly not an expert in this area, but I thought that PURE >silicon was an insulator because the way its crystal structure is >built. There are no free electrons in it. I don't see how temperature >can effect its conductance, unless something drastic starts happening >in the crystal structure. Chris' response to my question pretty >much confirmed this, although I would be curious to hear more about >what those mechanisms are which can do that. > >Lynne's response seems to apply to doped silicon. I agree the mobility >of those carriers can be influenced by temperature a great deal, but >again, I was curious about PURE silicon, since that's what my first >response (question) was triggered by. > >So is my recollection correct that at normal room temperatures and >thereabout, PURE silicon would still be a perfect insulator, or does >it have to be cooled way down (say to 77 K) to become an insulator? > >Thanks, > >Arpad >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: lgreen [mailto:lgreen22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=3D20 >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 3:28 PM >To: Christopher.Jakubiec@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Muranyi, Arpad; =3D >si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > >Hi, Arpad, > >Silicon bulk resistivity (and conductivity) is strongly temperature >dependent. At room temperature, the resistivity is higher than metals, = >=3D >but >too high to use it as a good insulator (hence the name semi-conductor). >Resistivity is also very sensitive to impurities, with the usual =3D >impurities >leading to a slightly n-type material in silicon. > >At "low" doping (about 10-100x the impurity level), the resistivity =3D >becomes >both lower and less sensitive to temperature. It also becomes possible = >=3D >to >predictably control the built-in junction potential. > >At very high temperatures, of course, the thermally generated carriers = >=3D >can >dominate over the doping. But that is normally outside the operating = >=3D >range, >unless you get a local high current density. > >- Lynne > > >-----Original Message----- >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = >=3D >On >Behalf Of Christopher.Jakubiec@xxxxxxxxxxxx >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 2:17 PM >To: arpad.muranyi@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > >Arpad, > >I agree with your statement to an extent. Current flow in silicon is >related to the amount of free carriers (either holes or electrons) that = >=3D >are >available to participate. Free carriers can be induced both by means of >impurity doping in the silicon, and electron/hole pairs can be thermally >generated even in pure silicon (although not normally for a practical >purpose). > >Regards, > >Chris >Infineon Technologies >=3D3D20 > >-----Original Message----- >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 2:15 PM >To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > > >Jut to clarify things I would like to ask a question: > >My understanding was that pure silicon is not conductive, not even at = >=3D >room >temperature(?). The doping is what freezes up some electrons to make it >conductive. How does this relate to temperature? > >Thanks, > >Arpad >-------------------------------------------------------------------------= >=3D >-- >-----Original Message----- >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >=3D3D3D On Behalf Of Daniel Chow >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:44 AM >To: John Zasio >Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > >My bad. > >My statement was true for pure silicon. > >Heavy doping significantly changes the properties of silicon. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: John Zasio [mailto:zasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=3D3D3D3D20 >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 10:25 AM >To: Daniel Chow >Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V5 #210 > >Daniel, > >Silicon devices do work and work well at liquid nitrogen =3D3D3D >temperatures.=3D3D3D3D20 CMOS devices will run at two to three times =3D >faster than >at room temperature. > >In the mid 80s ETA Systems shipped a CMOS Supercomputer cooled by liquid > >nitrogen. Although the product was not a commercial success, =3D >the=3D3D3D3D20 >technology worked very well. > >John Zasio > >Daniel Chow wrote: > > >Jon, > > > >No silicon part will work at liquid nitrogen temperatures (77 Kelvin). > > > >Silicon is an insulator at that temperature. The charge carriers are > >"frozen out" at low temperatures. > > > >Please refer to Chapter 8 of "Solid State Physics" by Charles Kittel >for more details. > > > >Thanks! > > >Daniel Chow, Ph.D. > >Sr. Product Engineer > >ALTERA > >Office: (408) 544-8100 > >Fax: (408) 544-7602 > >Email: dchow@xxxxxxxxxx=3D3D20 >------------------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe from si-list: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >For help: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > >List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > >List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe from si-list: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >For help: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > >List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > >List archives are viewable at: =20 > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >=20 > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe from si-list: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >For help: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > >List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > >List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu