[SI-LIST] Re: package SSN model accuracy requirements

  • From: Ray Anderson <ray.anderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 08:47:59 -0800


I think you may be misinterpreting what Lynne and the other posters in 
this thread have been discussing so far.

No one seems to be saying that SSO simulations should be done with IBIS 
(as it stands today).

The discussion is centered around the various package models. An IBIS 
model consists of the silicon model portion and the package model 
portion. One can take the package model portion (that is described in 
IBIS syntax) and rewrite it in Spice syntax if you so desire. So while 
some of the statements earlier in the thread may have referenced "IBIS 
lumped models" and "IBIS ICM" models, the crux of the discussion is 
related to model topologies, model complexity, model bandwidth, and 
model size where the "model" in question is the package model. All of 
these model attributes are relevant to SSO simulations regardless of 
what you choose as the silicon driver model.


Chris Cheng wrote:

>You can say what you want with IBIS, at the end of the day (today, not
>tomorrow or some future spec), can you do an SSO analysis based on a pure
>IBIS model ?
>I am a complete N00b on FPGA so I am curious how many people really do SSO
>analysis with just a standard IBIS description of a chip. I can't, so please
>tell me how you did it.
>Those who know me and my previous life somewhere should remember some of
>those reference SPICE SSO models I generated, there is only a small number
>of SPICE drivers, interconnect and receivers set that need to be included to
>accurately model SSO, x-talk, package/interconnect loss. Remember, m=x is a
>very powerful macro that doesn't even need to be an integer.
>Another interesting side note, some of the so call speedy "IBIS engines" end
>up barely faster or even slower in some cases when the same interconnect
>complexity is added to get the accuracy close to acceptable level. 
>All of the above SSO modelling methodolgies are well documented and
>correlated with actual characterization numbers. I am not talking about
>vaporware analysis here.

Raymond Anderson
Senior Signal Integrity Staff Engineer
Product Technology Dept.
Package Engineering Group
Xilinx Inc.

To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:

List technical documents are available at:

List archives are viewable at:     
or at our remote archives:
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:

Other related posts: