[SI-LIST] Re: non-negative off diagonal capacitive matrix elements ??
- From: Chris Cheng <chris.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Raymond.Anderson@xxxxxxx'" <Raymond.Anderson@xxxxxxx>,si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:31:35 -0700
i always wonder if the matrix is inverted through implicit
method such as ICCG instead of explicit LU deposition, will
the round off error still produce +ve off diagonal C elements.
chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Anderson [mailto:Raymond.Anderson@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 3:43 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: non-negative off diagonal capacitive matrix
elements ??
Thanks to all who responded on my question of non-negative
off diagonal elements in a capacitance matrix.
As I thought, the concensus opinion was that the very small
positive number was down in the numerical noise and is essentially
a zero entry in the matrix.
Thanks again.
-Ray
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
