[SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
- From: "S. Weir" <weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:18:23 -0700
Michael,
The device switching currents are fed by the board power system. If you
insert an impedance, you are choking the power supply and the on-chip
voltage rail drops. That is a very bad thing.
Regards,
Steve.
At 05:27 PM 7/11/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Can you explain why adding ferrite bead in series with a power lead is a
>bad thing? Thanks.
>
>Regards,
>Michael Chan
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ritchey Lee [mailto:leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:48 PM
>To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: decoupling
>
>
>
>Yes, at 250 MHz and up, the plane capacitor is the work horse. Imagine what
>happens when someone tells you to insert a ferrite bead in series with a
>power
>lead, isolating it from the plane capacitor. Really bad things! Sadly,
>many
>applications notes tell you to do this, as do some of the less well trained
>EMI
>people. I spend a lot of time fixing designs that have followed this
>advice.
>
>Lee
>
>Khalid Ansari wrote:
>
> > Larry,
> >
> > What happens much above 250 MHz, do we need any more
> > capacitors or is the power to ground plane capacitance
> > sufficient?
> >
> > >470 pF 232 MHz
> > >0.01 uF 50 MHz
> > >0.1 uF 16 MHz
> >
> > >Putting low ESR capacitors in parallel is like playing with fire. You
> > >can cook with fire and heat your house, but if you are not careful with
> > >fire, you will get burned. I am a strong advocate of multiple low ESR
> > >capacitors in parallel because I believe we have learned how to make
> > >good, safe use of them. The optimum power distribution system (fewest
> > >components, least cost, least complexity) is obtained from careful
> > >selection and placement of capacitors with a reasonably high Q (low
>ESR).
> > >
> > >The trick is to create a low and flat impedance profile in the
> > >frequency domain by using different valued capacitors in parallel.
> > >Systems behave best when chips look out and see a power distribution
> > >system that is resistive in phase (flat impedance). We like to
> > >establish a target impedance which is defined as
> > >
> > >
> > >Ztarget = power_supply_voltage * 5% / transient_current.
> > >
> > >If your PDS impedance meets the target impedance up to the highest
> > >frequency of interest, your noise will be within acceptable limits.
> > >Much more is written on this topic in
> > >
> > >"Power Distribution System Design Methodology and Capacitor
> > >Selection for Modern CMOS Technology"
> > >
> > >http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si_documents/docs.html
> > >
> > >It is easy to meet a 1 Ohm or 0.1 Ohm target impedance using "rules of
> > >thumb" for decoupling and high ESR capacitors. It becomes a little
> > >more difficult to meet a 10 mOhm target. If you are trying to meet 1
> > >mOhm target impedance up to several hundred MHz, it will be very
> > >difficult unless you have a well defined methodology and some software
> > >tools to help you. On some of our more recent products, at least one
> > >of each of the ceramic capacitors from the following menu are used:
> > >
> > >100uF,
> > >47uF, 22uF, 10uF,
> > >4.7uF, 2.2uF, 1uF,
> > >470nF, 220nF, 100nF,
> > >47nF, 22nF, 10nF,
> > >4.7nF, 2.2nF, 1nF,
> > >680pF, 470pF, 330pF, 220pF, 150pF, 100pF
> > >
> > >With three capacitors per decade of capacitance, it is possible to make
> > >a flat impedance vs frequency profile from about 200 kHz to 400 MHz
> > >without any problem from parallel antiresonances. The lower the ESL
> > >and ESR (within reason), the fewer components you need. X7R capacitors
> > >tend to have Q's between 2 and 5 and three values per decade are
> > >sufficient. NPO (COG) capacitors may have Q's between 5 and 10 and six
> > >values per decade are useful. Closely spaced power planes may be used
> > >instead of some of the pF capacitors.
> > >
> > >We have our own internal software tools to help manage the design.
> > >Cadence is marketing the Power Delivery Tool under SpectraQuest that
> > >does the same thing as our tools. The Cadence tool is even better
> > >because it is hooked up to the design data base for the PCB.
> > >
> > >Like all SI tools, these tools are based on models and the analysis is
> > >only as good as the models. These days, I spend half of my life out in
> > >the lab measuring capacitors and reducing the measured data. The
> > >capacitor vendors could help me greatly by measuring the ESR and ESL of
> > >their capacitors and publishing the data. They could also help by
> > >designing capacitors that have the absolute minimum internal
> > >inductance. BTW, traditional measurement techniques do not obtain very
> > >good values for ESR and ESL. (Maybe that should be the topic of
> > >another email.)
> > >
> > >regards,
> > >Larry Smith
> > >Sun Microsystems
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > For help:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> > List archives are viewable at:
>//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > Old list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
