WRT has numerous DesignCon papers and tutorials on 3D EM simulation to measurement, including calibration and measurement validation on our website. See the last tutorial "Methods of Improving 3D EM Model Development and Associated Time/Frequency Domain Measurements" we co-authored with Tektronix and Anritsu. Our customers have had issues with EVERY field solver I know of, and in some cases it was not the user or set up issues - it was the solver, and in many cases it was measurement, incorrect meshing, wrong loss model or material extraction, incorrect stack up, etc.,. The problems ranged from VIA fields appearing inductive where they measured capacitive, simple microstrip impedances off by 4ohms, huge resonance issues for a simple stripline. Having said that there we have had good results with both HFSS, CST, and Simbeor (we had good correspondence with Agilent ADS out to 20GHz several years ago and expect to repeat the correspondence out to 50GHz fairly soon). Simbeor has a nifty method of making the material extraction fairly simple, you still need to include the hooks in your platform and make some good VNA measurements, but the tool does the dirty work so you don't need to iterate solutions like before. We very much like Yury's EDA tool and use it extensively to design our platforms. We conduct a 1 hour Web seminar that has only one slide of marketing content, it is all technical and combines methodology of correspondence including measurement practice using VNA. ping me if your interested. Products for the Signal Integrity Practitioner Alfred P. Neves Chief Technologist Office: 503-679-2429 www.wildrivertech.com On Aug 2, 2013, at 8:25 AM, "Ken Cantrell" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ye Tao, > I have found HFSS to be, as Steve put it, deadly accurate. I think part of > the issue is that it requires an advanced background in electromagnetics to > understand what the software is really doing. Understand the mathematics, > and you will arrive at the correct answer. Do this a thousand times, like > Steve, Scott, Eric, and other well known contributors to the List, and > you're on your way. It's just a matter of hard work after that. > > Ken > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of steve weir > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 2:03 AM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: about hfss tdr function > > HFSS is as deadly accurate as the information you supply to it and the > boundary conditions you establish. There are three answers to every > high frequency question: The simulation, the measurement, and the cold > hard truth. It is something of a fine art getting the first two to > align with the third. > > Steve. > On 8/1/2013 11:37 PM, ye tao wrote: >> with agilent TDR,this via is 47 ohm,the sim model Dimensions is the real >> size,I Sliced via and measured. >> So,I think HFSS TDR is not very exactly,the result of simulation is higher >> than measure 2~3 ohm,Do you experience such problems?I know increase the >> antipad can fix it,but how simulate the via impedance,According 53 ohm >> maybe better? >> I simulated the trace line use hfss tdr,the result is almost same with >> test,but the via is different,and I alter window function no improvement. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List forum is accessible at: >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> > > > -- > Steve Weir > IPBLOX, LLC > 1580 Grand Point Way > MS 34689 > Reno, NV 89523-9998 > www.ipblox.com > > (775) 299-4236 Business > (866) 675-4630 Toll-free > (707) 780-1951 Fax > > All contents Copyright (c)2013 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved. > This e-mail may contain confidential material. > If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records > and notify the sender. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu