[SI-LIST] Re: Xilinx SpartanT-3/3E/3L FPGA Power Solutions-- FromMonolithic Solutions

  • From: "Vivekkumar M-TLS,Chennai" <Vivekkumarm@xxxxxx>
  • To: <Istvan.Novak@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:10:38 +0530

Dear Istvan Novak,

Thank you for your inputs.

If we design the Regulator for an entire range, will there be an effect
on the efficiency?? Please advice us.

Regards
Vivek 

-----Original Message-----
From: Istvan.Novak@xxxxxxx [mailto:Istvan.Novak@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:44 PM
To: Vivekkumar M-TLS,Chennai
Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Xilinx SpartanT-3/3E/3L FPGA Power Solutions--
FromMonolithic Solutions

Dear Vivek,

You can approach the question from the opposite end as well. If you have
a given design for a certain maximum current, you rightfully want to use
that design with a load current anywhere between zero and full maximum
allowed load.  And of course, you dont want to change components on the
fly just because the load current has changed.  Your point is valid
though: 
external components should be
designed with the operational range in mind.  If you design the circuit
to work well in the entire range (in this case 0 to 3A) but use it only
in a subrange (0 to 1A), the result will be somewhat suboptimum, but
still may work very well.

Regards,

Istvan Novak
SUN Microsystems


Vivekkumar M-TLS,Chennai wrote:
> Dear  All ,
>  
> I happened to look into the Step Down Converters from MonothilicPower.
> The following is the statement made in the webpage:
>  
> MPS presents the MP2309 and MP2307 23V synchronous step-down
regulators.
> With an output current rating of 1A and 3A respectively, the MP2309 
> and
> MP2307 are pin compatible with the 2A MP2305, forming a power 
> management solution that can easily scale from 1A to 3A without 
> circuit board re-design.
>  
> http://www.monolithicpower.com/fpga_xilinx_spartan.htm
>  
> Could  anyone  please explain how come this is feasible.
>  
>  Following are the general rules for a step Down converter:
>  
> 1) Since the input capacitor (C1) absorbs the input switching current 
> it requires an adequate ripple current rating.
> 2) The worst-case condition occurs at VIN = 2VOUT,where IC1 = ILOAD/2.
> 3) Inductor should be chosen that it will not saturate under the 
> maximum inductor peak current. The peak inductor current hence is 
> dependent on the Load Current.
>  
> Hence how is that if  we  want to change to a different load 
> requirement, only a Monolithic power solution Chip change is enough. 
> How come the external components remain with the same rating for 
> different loads.
>  
> Please can anyone explain this . It will be of great learning to us 
> here.
>  
> Thanks
> Regards
> Vivek.
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only.
> It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its 
> affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL
or its affiliates.
> Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, 
> modification, distribution and / or publication of this message 
> without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.
>
>
>   

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: