[SI-LIST] Re: Why is capacitor with high ESR

  • From: Chris Cheng <Chris.Cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'steve weir '" <weirsp@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'sguzek@xxxxxxxxx '" <sguzek@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Si-List '" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:41:00 -0800

Steve,
There are zillions of ground vias spread all over due to chips and bypasses
and passives. On top of that you have most of the decoupling acting as LR
load at EMI frequencies all over the places. Do you still think those
resonance peaks that one predicts purely based on the rectangular geometry
of the board will remain in the same frequency location with the same
amplitude ? Or they will be spread out with tiny little peaks based on the
locality of the ground via density of the chips and passives ? To take the
transmission line analogy, in stead of a single transmission with a source
and a load at the ends, what if there are many many shorts and L/R load
along the way, can the energy be still concentrated ?
 

-----Original Message-----
From: steve weir
To: sguzek@xxxxxxxxx; Si-List
Sent: 12/4/2004 7:51 AM
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Why is capacitor with high ESR

Slavek, the issue is not whether a fence can be made to reflect well.
They 
can.  I am not concerned with leakage through the via fence which can be

made small up to pretty high frequencies.  The issue is what becomes of
the 
energy after it reflects back into the PCB.  There are only two places
for 
the energy to go:

1. Heat losses within the board as it bounces back and forth.
2. Radiation.

Signal vias on the board carry the reflected energy up to the board
surface 
to various features and parts that are by definition out of the cavity, 
where they can radiate.  With a perfect termination scheme, the incident

wave is converted to heat, and does not reflect.  So only the incident
wave 
impinges any given via, rather than the incident and all significant 
reflections.

Regards,

Steve.
At 04:31 PM 12/4/2004 +0100, Slawek Guzek wrote:
>Steve,
>
>In general yes, but...
>
>Vias should be conected to ground plane and placed quite close each
other
>as I wrote not more than 1/16, (much closer if possible) of shortest 
>wavelength
>expected to be excited.  So you should not see any of peaks and valleys
>because propagating wave will be significally longer than distance
between 
>vias.
>
>On the other hand vias have some inductance, so short (or ground plane 
>connection
>will not be perfect, but I think it would better reflect internal EM
wave 
>than just
>open end of PCB.
>
>Another solution  which comes to my mind is to make thin border around
every
>layer, and then make a metallisation of PCB edge.
>
>Like this:
>
>Top ground              -----------] <- edge metallisation
>Internal signal 1               -------  --] <- edge metallisation
>internal power          -------  --] <- edge metallisation
>.                       -------  --] <- edge metallisation
>.                       -------  --] <- edge metallisation
>Bottom ground           -----------] <- edge metallisation
>
>Regardsm
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of steve weir
> > Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 11:57 AM
> > To: sguzek@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Why is capacitor with high ESR
> >
> >
> > Slavek the issues with ground fences:
> >
> > 1. The reflected energy hits vias which provide a path to the top of
the
> > board and features that radiate.
> > 2. The decoupling response exhibits a series of peaks and valleys on
> > quarter wave multiples.
> >
> > An ideal plane termination would absorb all the energy and eliminate
both
> > effects.
> >
> > Steve.
> > At 09:07 AM 12/4/2004 +0100, Slawek Guzek wrote:
> > >Dear Zhangkun,
> > >
> > >[....]
> > >
> > > > According to the transmission line theory, when the transmission
line
> > > is matched, there is no resonance. At the edge of
> > > > PCB, the EM energy is reflected because the transmission line is
OPEN.
> > >
> > >I think you've made some small error in your concept. Indeed, EM 
> energy is
> > >reflected IF line IS open,
> > >but at the end of the PCB line in not perfectly open -  ground
plane and
> > >power plane form a radiating
> > >element - a kind of a dipole.  Some of the EM energy is radiated
outside,
> > >because of variable E field
> > >lines at the PCB edge closed through air from power to ground plane
> > >
> > >
> > > > Traditional decoupling capacitors are of low ESR,
> > > > which could not damping the resonance. Therefore I need
capacitor with
> > > high ESR, whose ESR should be matched with the
> > > > transmission line. On the other hand, the ESL is critical at
high
> > > frequency. The ESL should be as small as possible. The
> > > > package of capacitor mainly determines ESL so that the package
should
> > > be as small as possible, such as 0402 or 0603. The
> > > > capacitance should be as large as possible so that some benifit
could
> > > be gotten at lower freqeuncy domain.
> > >
> > >
> > >It is much easier get close to perfect short circuit than close to 
> perfect
> > >open, so in my opinion,
> > >from EMI point of view, it could be much more efficient to finish
power
> > >plane with some margin to
> > >PCB edge, and fill up this space with vias connected to ground
plane,
> > >spaced not more than 1/16
> > >(one says even 1/100) of shortest wavelength you expect to be
excited
> > >between power and ground planes.
> > >That case RF energy really reflects back into PCB, noises on traces
> > >perhaps would be greater,
> > >but significantly smaller portion would be radiated.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Slawek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
field
> > >
> > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > >For help:
> > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > >List technical documents are available at:
> > >                 http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > >List archives are viewable at:
> > >                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > >or at our remote archives:
> > >                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > >                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
field
> >
> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> > For help:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> >                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> > List technical documents are available at:
> >                 http://www.si-list.org
> >
> > List archives are viewable at:
> >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > or at our remote archives:
> >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
> >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>                 http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: