[SI-LIST] Which package model is more useful and practical?
- From: "Eric Hsu" <ehsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Ibis-Users (E-mail)" <ibis-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"Si-List (E-mail)" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:06:06 -0800
Hi Expert,
Has anyone ever really used *.pkg with IBIS model to do some =
simulation, such as SSN? If so, can anyone let me know what's benefit we =
can get from it? Myself prefer choosing IBIS model with package data for =
pin R/L/C from itself, to any other package model like *.pkg or =
S-parameter. If go to IBIS open forum to search all the ibis model, so =
far I did not find any of them really using .pkg model with their ibis =
model. If the chip get low pin count, I think it is easy to handle *.pkg =
model because it is possible to verify accuracy for all the parasitic =
effect. But for big chip, I don't know is there any way can handle that?
For most of the application, I guess, probably it is not necessary to =
provide .pkg model with ibis, because it may only provide one or two =
order accuracy than per-pin R/L/C format in ibis. Tool compatibility may =
be another issue.
Best Regards,
Eric Hsu
Interface Technologies
Netlogic Microsystems, Inc.
450 National Ave.
Mountain View, CA 94043
650-961-6676 x198
This e-mail contains Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. Confidential =
information
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
