Hi Pugal, Yes, instead of backdrilling, you can switch layers from the top towards the bottom. If you have enough traces that can be safely placed on top layers, this is a free solution. Otherwise we under-utilize the top layers Your second question also relates to the first question. You can optimize the via dimensions to get a matched via, and if you can achieve a good matching, going through the via from top to bottom will not hurt the signaling other than adding a small delay. However, many times it is not easy to achieve matched vias, because we dont want to perforate the ground planes (which provide the return path) too much. Smaller antipads are good for providing better return path in dense via fields, but it will reduce via impedance. When you hear the statement in your second question, it refers to the dilemma between via impedance and plane perforation. Regards, Istvan Novak Oracle On 5/11/2011 11:57 PM, Newbie Pugal wrote: > Hi All, > I have two questions for you all, > > > 1) Instead of backdrilling can we reduce the via stub by changing the routing > layer near to the bottom layers? say we have 16 layer board and signals are > routed in layer 4, instead of backdrilling from bottom to layer 5 shall we > change the signal routing to layer 14 or 15? How much impact it will create > on high speed signals with difference to backdrilling? does the long via > create inductance effect? > > > 2) It is mentioned to enlarge the antipad size of signal via for better > signal quality, why? > > Thanks > Pugal ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu