[SI-LIST] Re: Traces don't cause EMI - really?
- From: "Hassan O. Ali" <hassan@xxxxxxxx>
- To: leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:18:54 -0400
Lee,
I think you need to describe your measurement setup so that we clearly
understand what you are talking about.
For example, you need to describe the following:
- transmission line type (microstrip, stripline, etc.)
- transmission line geometry (trace length, trace width, height above
plane, trace/plane thickness, etc.)
- material parameters (substrate, conductors, etc)
- frequency range of measurement
- excitation source
- transmission line termination conditions (both ends)
- field probing technique (near-field? far-field? how was that measured?)
- what you mean by "significant emissions"? - give a limit e.g. 20dB
below FCC Class B)
Regards.
Hassan.
Lee Ritchey wrote:
>Brent,
>
>I've tried several times to measure significant emissions from a single
>transmission line travelling over a plane at the distances above the plane
>one uses to create signal paths for logic circuits, the topic of concern in
>this thread, with no luck.
>
>I welcome measurements from others that supports the statement that traces
>over planes are significant sources of EMI. So far, no one has presented
>such evidence. Lacking such evidence, how can anyone make such claims?
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
