[SI-LIST] To S-parameterize or not to S-parameterize?

From: <colin_warwick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:47:19 -0600

Hi,
I'm trying to validate/invalidate the hypothesis that S-parameter adoption 
isn't universal in the signal integrity field and also understand the barriers 
and benefits of adoption versus not. So, please take a moment to vote in this 
informal two-question survey:

http://signal-integrity-tips.com/2009/s-parameters/

If you vote you'll also see the results so far in real time.

Also, please leave a comment on the site or email me directly if you have 
opinions not covered in the survey options.

Thanks!

-- Colin


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

[SI-LIST] To S-parameterize or not to S-parameterize?

Other related posts: