Hi All, I am trying to figure out what is the optimal approach to get the most accurate time domain simulation result from an limited frequency range S-parameter data Let's take a simple stripline trace as an example. The maximum frequency in my application is 13GHz, I have S-parameter simulation data up to 40GHz. The S11 data is shown below: If I do a direct IFFT on the data above, the time domain result looks rather discrete and nonphysical (the DUT starts from 125ps to 300ps). Could someone help to explain why this is the case here? Is it because the sharp cut off at the S11 data at 40GHz? After applying hanning window to the S-parameter data, the S11 and TDR plots is shown below. The TDR plot is what I was expecting: you get a some port mismatch at the attach, shown as the overshoot at 50ps and 175ps. Between 75 and 150ps is the real trace impedance and the value agrees with other simulation tool as well. The part that puzzles me is that we damped the high frequency response of the original S-parameter data to achieve this. If we don't care about the higher frequency (>fMax) response, why is it always recommended to simulate beyond fMax and filter it afterwards? If we do need to see the "full picture" but need to damp the S-parameter, how do we determine the correct amount of filtering needed? Thanks,Harold ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu