Craig's ominous warning seems to me to be a bit unfair to the Interactive Products software. I am not saying that he is wrong, but I think it would be better to say that you need to be careful with a coupled, lossy model generated by ANY software. We have been working on a paper here at Samtec which compares various approaches to lossy (and lossless) modeling. We have investigated the Interactive Products software and the Hspice W-element, along with several other commonly available packages, including some measurement based approaches. There are a lot of tools out there. Our efforts have been ongoing for several years. We were planning to publish the results to date at DesignConn in January, but our paper was not selected for presentation. We are currently considering other options, but haven't firmed up anything yet. The paper won't include any Earth shattering technological break-throughs or secret processes, but will be more of a "lessons learned" sort of document. We should have something presentable in a month or two, and I will post a notice to the list here when appropriate. In general, we have found that the "best" modeling method depends on your particular situation (how many times have you heard that here?). There are definitely pros and cons to each approach. Describing any one of them as the be all, end all, silver bullet solution just doesn't make sense. One of the biggest factors in determining which approach is best for a particular situation is the type of physical structure involved. We're personally experienced with cables, PCB's, and connectors. Each of those tends to have unique features which steer us towards different modeling approaches. Other important trade offs include desired accuracy, time and effort required to develop the model, time and effort required to use the model, length scalability, and model portability. Available material properties information can play into the mix as well. I'll let you know when our paper is ready for prime time, and how to access it. Julian Ferry High Speed Engineering Manager Samtec, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Powell Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:39 PM To: nicklas@xxxxxxxxx; cclewell@xxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Those of you interested in Field Solvers, Stack Ups, Spacing, Crosstalk, Matlab I am going to make a statement that I cannot support and would be interested in any knowledgeable responses: I had understood that the W-element model in HSPICE was the best (Hspice) lossy coupled Tline model. regards, jon -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Nicklas Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 3:11 PM To: cclewell@xxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Those of you interested in Field Solvers, Stack Ups, Spacing, Crosstalk, Matlab Craig, Thanks for the info. First of all it is the BEM Field Solver Report and EZStack Module I was referring to. Secondly, the SPICE model generator is not included with EZStack, however the lossy SPICE models work well if you know what you are doing and use the appropriate one. I have benchmarked the lossy ladder and lossy modal models against H-SPICE, and I have found them to be stabile (e.g. no causality), faster and they are universally portable. You just have to know that in general, ladder models are better for shorter structures and modal models are good for longer ones such as cables. (This has to do with the modes of propagation and the controlled sources derived from the eigen values for the modal models, and the inherent solve time issue with respect to the ladder models for longer structures). Nicklas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Clewell" <cclewell@xxxxxxxxx> To: <nicklas@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 16:40 Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Those of you interested in Field Solvers, Stack Ups, Spacing, Crosstalk, Matlab > ....be careful of the lossy models that this software generates. > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of degerfors1 > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:09 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Those of you interested in Field Solvers, Stack Ups, > Spacing, Crosstalk, Matlab > > > There has been much discussion on these topics lately, and I just > wanted to advise those interested that there is a FREE new BEM > product with a beautiful interface and extensive report which > includes Zo,Zeven,Zodd,Zdiff,LRCG, and crosstalk coefficients > available which can do all of the things being discussed of late in > this forum. It has been benchmarked against numerous SI tools such > as Ansoft and comes up strong. You should check it out. > > http://www.interactive-products.com > > Nicklas > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.796 / Virus Database: 540 - Release Date: 11/13/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.796 / Virus Database: 540 - Release Date: 11/13/2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu