[SI-LIST] Re: Termination resistance value for GTL+ bus
- From: Mike Brown <bmgman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: samuel_dadel@xxxxxxxxx, si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:20:25 -0500
Your equation does not tell you what the correct termination value is -
it tells you what the minimum permissible value is while remaining
within the DC spec of the driver. That is solely a function of the driver, and
not a function of the interconnection Zo. The greater-than-specified swing is
not atypical. It merely means that the driver has a better-than-spec current
sink capability. I would expect that of most parts at nominal Vdd. You don't
mention whether this is a steady-state condition, or whether it is a transient
value.
You need to look at the waveforms at the driver and at the terminated
ends of the bus to figure out what the right impedance is. As you try
to analyze the waveforms, imagine the driver to be a TDR with a very low source
impedance (6-8 ohms). You can probably make a pretty good guess at the
effectiveimpedance of the line by using the loaded line correction factor
(1/sqrt(1+Cl/Co))* Zo. A 50 ohm board can easily look like 40 ohms or
less (much less,in some configurations!) when loaded with distributed C.
Hopefully, your loads have minimum stub length off of the main run. If the
stubs are short, they may be treatable as a capacitive load for purposes of
this
estimation. If they are not, you probably need to resort to simulation to find
the best termination
value.
There's not enough info for a specific diagnosis.
Regards
Mike
Samuel Dadel wrote:
>Hi! All, I am new to transmission lines: so I would greatly appreciate of
someone could give me some leads on the following. I am employing a dual-ended
parallel termination scheme for a GTL+ bus. The driver has the capacity to
sink
50mA. The Vol is .5 and the Voh is 1.5, and the Vref is 1.0 [Nominal]. When
employing a 50ohm termination scheme I see a voltage swing of 1.15 Volts at
the driver, with Vol gone down to 0.3 Volts. The nominal values
>
> are 1.5 and 0.5. I get bit errors, that go away when Vref
>
> is lowered to 0.8 Volts.
>
> Could this be a case of unmatched termination? In addition: these is this
additional equation that I cannot relate to the characteristic impedance of
the trace. Iol[max] = .050 Amps. Iol = Vtt - Vol / R[eff]. R[eff] = 1.5 -
0.5
/ .050 = 20 ohms. For a dual ended termination scheme Rtt = 20 * 2 = 40
ohms.Thanks,Daniel
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
>
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
