Hi, I realize that this thread has been done before, but as we all know, technology changes pretty fast, and what might have been true a year or two ago, may not still be true today. I am ready to make a large investment in signal integrity test equipment for my company. I'm probably no more than a week away from the decision. As some of you will no doubt suggest to get both, let me just say that I can not afford both. I will have one or the other. I have had the demos and seen the equipment. What I do for a living is design boards for digital video, that are comprised of many differential pairs, routed closely together. Rising edges are in the neighborhood of 100 ps. I want to be able to find and modify discontinuities (either capacitive or inductive), determine crosstalk between the pairs and measusre jitter (yes, I will need a signal source for that). If this were as little as two years ago I would have believed that the VNA solution would have been the most versatile. However, Tektronix has made a lot of progress with their TDR equipment and with their "Iconnect" software. Also, there is a big difference in price between the TDR solution and the VNA solution. In appealing to the SI group for opinions I am trying to go beyond my own predjudice and the marketing hype. Thank You Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu