Hello all, Once I have some kind of assumed good system model for a power rail, ideally I'd like to have already finished an extraction of I vs. t for worst case pwr bump of the chip -- from simulation using a best-accuracy tool. Later on, in an ideal world where time, etc., are cheap I'd like a bare-die profile of the same, gotten from measurements -- for each worst case pwr bump. I'd use this as behavioral current stimulus for my PDN in simulations. Specifically, the I vs. t for peak would be for peak CHANGES in I --- that is, from chip's state changes that produce the largest swing in I and slew rate. With no credible stimulus, all the SI tool time is useless for pwr integrity. My question: The above two ways to generate such stimulus are actually damn costly, especially if decision makers aren't forward looking and there's no time to go back & do it "right". Yet I can get SI tools as part of the normal course and generate the pwr models. Next best thing: turn the problem around ..... 1. invent [I vs. t] stimulus based on estimates from real chip sim data & models 2. find the worst case stimulus (guaranteed to be unrealistic) 3. yet, this will find the worst case swing (peak & slew rate cases), though time scale will be a total WAG (a guess) ---> may still have some value Any thoughts...? -Agathon ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu