Raj, Please see my comments. >1. If you are doing cables (say shielded twisted pair), it may be better >to use a Finite Difference or Finite Element based more general 2-D >software. I am not sure why FDM or FEM inheritedly is better than MoM even in closed boundaries. Can you explain ? >2. I do not think it handles dielectric loss. As mentioned in some response, it does model dielectric loss in 2.0 >3. It does not handle magnetic materials and probably neither do most >commercial programs. I will be very worry if my PCB starts to have magnetic material behavior >4. If accurate skin effect inductance and resistance are important, >again, other programs which divide the area of cross-section into many >fine filaments would be needed. To a degree. Linpar does generate the R(sqrt(f)) skin effect model based on a fully pronounced skin depth assumption. One can argue whether this is good enough for thick traces at >GHz >5. It does not produce a HSPICE w-element compatible model directly. But you can now use the touchstone S params models in HSPICE. >6. I have already pointed out a minor problem I had with non-zero >forward crosstalk for a homogenous medium I will be very interested in the exact structure that generates this error. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu