[SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Which tool is the best - LINPARdiscussion
- From: Steve Corey <steven.corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:42:56 -0700
Ray -- although your statement is correct, it is numerically difficult
to achieve. Not all algorithms are robust enough to fit long, nearly
lossless delays. Furthermore, simulations of electrically large, nearly
lossless systems take longer as well. How to extract delay and treat it
separately when fitting such data is a current area of research.
Of course, this phenomena isn't isolated to rational approximations, but
is a general problem with stiff systems -- those which have both
microscopic and macroscopic behaviors excited simultaneously. A long
cable with little loss driven with a fast-risetime signal is a good
example. As a broad generalization, the wider the range of behaviors
being simulated, the more memory and time that will be required to
simulate it.
Different simulation and modeling techniques are optimized for different
types of systems. For example, good distributed transmission line
models are often better for simulating long transmission lines at fast
risetimes than are straight rational approximations.
-- Steve
-------------------------------------------
Steven D. Corey, Ph.D.
Time Domain Analysis Systems, Inc.
"The Interconnect Analysis Company."
http://www.tdasystems.com
email: steven.corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
phone: (503) 246-2272
fax: (503) 246-2282
-------------------------------------------
Raymond Anderson wrote:
> Raj Raghuram wrote:
>
>
>>>I am not sure modeling with S-params would work for long transmission
>>>lines i.e. metres in length. Most s-parameter simulators use a rational
>>>fit which in the end is a lumped model. Maybe you can comment on this.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> The delay information required to model an electrically long structure
> such as a transmission line is contained in the phase information of the
> complex s-parameters.
>
> Most instruments output the phase of s-parameters in the range of +180
> to -180 degrees. Plotted wrt frequency it resembles a sawtooth. This
> modulo 360 phase info needs to be unwrapped into a linear phase
> progression to interpret it as delay.
>
> When a rational polynomial approximation is fitted to the unwrapped
> s-parameter data, if the phase part of the approximation is the same as
> the phase of the original s-parameter then I'd expect the resultant
> macromodel to exhibit the same delay characteristics.
>
> Comments ???
>
>
> -Ray Anderson
>
> Sun Microsystems Inc.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
