Sunil, Unfortunately, there are no simple answers at 10Gbps. At that speed, there are three main concerns and you have already mentioned two: dielectric losses and discontinuities. The third is skin-effect losses, which can be mitigated by widening your traces and spaces and increasing the dielectric thickness to maintain a 100-Ohm differential impedance. To be certain of the design, one must develop a link budget and determine what margin remains after all losses (including reflections from discontinuities) have been accounted for. If your link length is short, then it may be possible to ignore dielectric and skin-effect losses and use standard FR-4. What defines "short" will depend on your design; the dividing line may be on the order of 10cm at this speed. As you point out, the advantage of microstrip is that no vias are required. The disadvantages are that the plating process on the outer layers makes it more difficult to control the impedance, and soldermask tends to be fairly lossy. Fortunately, at 10Gbps non-TEM modes that exist in non-homogeneous dielectrics should not be a problem yet. Stripline can be made to work, but attention must be paid to both the signal vias and the vias in the reference planes for the return current, including the signal via stubs (blind vias or back-drilling can eliminate these). A 3D field solver can be most helpful here. Some useful references: High-Speed Signal Propagation by Johnson/Graham (particularly Chapters 2, 3 and 6, as well as section 5.5 on vias), A SI Introduction to RocketIO Transceivers, and Loss Budgeting for RocketIO Transceivers. The last two are DVDs available from Xilinx at: http://www.xilinx.com/products/design_resources/signal_integrity/index.htm and contain much useful information no matter which vendor's parts you are using. Scroll to the bottom of the page for more information. Again, no simple answers but I hope I've been helpful. -Bill /************************************ / billw@xxxxxxxxxxx / / / / Advanced Electronic Concepts, LLC / / www.aec-lab.com / ************************************ ================================================= sunil.mekad@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I was planning to route high speed differential traces 10Gbps over > standard FR-4 material. Can anyone suggest which FR-4 material can be > used (Nelco N4000-6 or Rogers RO4350)? Is it possible to do use standard > FR-4 without compromising signal quality. > > Also is it recommended to route these traces over microstrip rather than > striplines traces? If I route it over stripline then it would require > vias to be put on every pair of these differential traces .. I am not > too comfortable doing that!! > > Can anyone tell what can be done? Thanks in anticipation, > > Regards, > Sunil > > > > Confidentiality Notice=0D > > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= > this message are intended > for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= > privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= > Mailadmin@xxxxxxxxx immediately > and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu